Everything News Jobs Opportunities Events Products/Services
more
 
About
Go to Home
Sign Up Sign in

Green Power Conferences

18 Apr 2011 10:04:33

8 technologies to rock the bio world



Game changer, breakthrough, revolution, quantum leap. A lot of technologies arrive on the editorial doorstep wrapped in one of those descriptors, or another. Sometimes wrapped in all of them. But what are technologies that would really rock the bio world? We see so much innovation in the fuel processing technologies, and in the genetics of crops. But what about the platform improvements in feedstock production and harvest?

There are a handful that would have catalytic impact, not only for their investors, but for a host of technologies and companies downstream that would see their fortunes irrevocably improved. We've named them the Transformers. In some cases, the hunt has been on for some time. In others, there's hardly any activity at all. Let's take a look at eight platform inventions that would turn the bio-based fuels and materials industry upside down.


There's an awful lot of jatropha going into the ground in various parts of the world. One thing that would make jatropha a lot more economically feasible is a mechanical jatropha harvester. It's not very sexy technology, in so many ways – no synthbio, no Nobel Prizes in sight – but harvesters are absolutely key to taking any crop from serving a subsistence economy and making it effectively serve an industrial economy. Traditional tree shakers don't get the job done. Lately, BEI says it has developed such a technology, and is trialling it now, down in Honduras at the Agroipsa Farm.


A bunch of companies are chasing low-cost cellulosic sugars, among them, Proterro, Comet Biorefining and Naturally Scientific. Why five-cents per pound? Generally, at those prices, cellulosic renewable fuels made from agricultural residues start to really rock, and other fermentation processes such as those from Solazyme and Gevo – as they are able to train their magic bugs to tolerate the "dirty sugars" – start to have dramatically expanded potential for expanding production capacity at affordable fuel prices. Former US vice-president Thomas Marshall said "What this country needs is a good five-cent cigar," but it is a good five-cent cellulosic sugar that would transform cellulosic conversion technologies from players in the high-value chemicals and feed markets into fuel monsters.


At 40 tons per acre per year – generally at this time only achievable with a handful of terrestrial plant forms, and algae – opens up the potential capacity of systems. Remember, key to making renewable fuels economical is scale, and key to scale is how far you can affordably transport biomass, and how much production land can be sustainably put to work to deliver biomass to a given plant. A 20-square mile plantation, at those production rates (assuming you can locate all the nutrients), yields 192,000 tons of biomass, enough, for example, to supply 50 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol.

Algal growth technologies are, generally, well on the way to making this an every day reality. 25 gram per square meter per day systems equate to about 36 tons of biomass per acre per year, and that's becoming table stakes in algal development. But not everyone can use, or grow, algae, and that form of biomass has its own set of special challenges. A 30 ton per acre, sustainably produced, wood or terrestrial crop? Game changer.


While we are on the subject of the special challenges of growing algae, there's the problem of getting the algae out of the water, or the water out of the algae. Given that a decent microalgae concentration is around 0.1 percent, you have to remove 1000 gallons of water per gallon to get a gallon of dry algal biomass, which has about 50,000 BTUs or so. So even if you are expending just a handful of BTUs per gallon to move the water, you're dangerously close to using more energy to produce algal fuels than the fuel contains.

That's why consortia such as the NAABB have made this is high priority, and it ranks near the top of the problem chart in the Algal Technology Roadmap developed by the DOE. Companies such as Solazyme and Aurora Algae say they have proprietary solutions, and companies like OriginOil and AlgaeVenture Technologies have been developing solutions for license. For sure, no algae fuel company will emerge at scale without a solution to this one.


The great news about cheap sugars of the non-cellulosic kind is that there is plenty of land available for growing additional cane in Brazil, Angola, Pakistan or Mozambique. The bad news? That's not generally where the fuel users are, and visions of Africa and Latin America planted with cheap cane for providing fuel to the EU, the US, or China, smacks to many of a return to colonialism.

So, what's a fuel-starved country from the cold north to do? Develop a sugar crop that thrives in cold climates. In recent years, extremophile species have been the object of increasing attention – we've discovered that understanding how some life can thrive in extreme conditions gives us added optionality.

Developing plants that can utilize less sunlight and heat without losing productivity (or failing to survive at all) is a key to unlocking the bio-based opportunities in the colder EU and North American climates. Could be a cold-loving cane, or higher-productivity sugar beets or sweet sorghum. Any way you slice it, a solution that competes with Brazilian cane is going to attract huge amounts of attention.


A major limiting factor in growing biomass affordable is the cost of transporting the carbon that the plants or microorganisms need. In their ordinary lives, they fix atmospheric carbon. The process doesn't happen nearly fast enough. The key enzyme? RuBisCo. "Biofuels research," we observed in a "To fix carbon, food, energy: fix RuBisCO, "while impressive and laudable, is overly focused on midstream processing technologies and not on the key factor: the appallingly low rate at which plants convert sunlight to energy. For example, corn checks in with a 1–2 percent efficiency rate. Raise photosynthetic efficiencies to 10–12 percent. With such a fix, so many of the concerns about biofuels – cost parity, food vs fuel, the cost of transporting biomass – begin to melt away.


In recent articles, we've written not only about the opportunities in RuBisco, but the increasing scarcity of phosphorus. But what about nitrogen take-up. The rate at which soybeans, for example, can fix atmospheric nitrogen is pretty slow for prime-time biofuels, resulting in productivities under 100 gallons per acre per year. Other terrestrial crops can't even do that, and require applications of fertilizer. "In the last 50 years the N fertilization of crop plants worldwide has increased more than 20-fold. However, use of this fertilizer is generally inefficient, as only about a third of the fertilizer applied is actually absorbed by crops, and 50–70% is lost from the plant-soil system," write Shrawat and Good in a recent review of nitrogen.

Improving that rate to, say, 70 percent, would have the cost of fertilizer application, and prevent a whole bunch of nitrogen run-off, which causes microbial blooms when the nitrogen concentrates in rivers, and can lead to oxygen depletion and fish kills.


Ask just about anyone, particularly in the field of making biofuels from syngas, what they would like to see a lot more of, and they will tell you "cheap hydrogen". To make a hydrocarbon fuel from syngas, you not only need hydrogen, you need it in the right ratio with syngas' other product, carbon monoxide, to make your process efficient and affordable.

But there's another reason to look at this as a game changer. Companies like LanzaTech are now coming forward with magic bugs that can ferment carbon dioxide into fuels. Imagine taking all that coal-fired power flue gas and turning it into a substitute for imported fossil oils. Well, you need cheap hydrogen to make the process work economically; the more fuel, the more hydrogen. It's also needed to turn renewable oils into renewable diesel and jet fuel, using the hydrotreating process as developed by UOP.

Currently, hydrogen is commercially produced from natural gas, and releases carbon dioxide as a byproduct – so that's going in the wrong direction. One good source: seawater.

This article was written by Jim Lane, editor of Biofuels Digest, and originally appeared on the World Biofuels Markets website.


Discussion Thread  

 


Green Power Conferences Community



Linked Items From Green Power Conferences


  1. "Why make a $2 fuel when you can make a $5 chemical?" asks Cobalt CEO Rick Wilson, whose company...

    18 Apr 2011
  2. Ruud Lubbers, former Prime Minister of the NetherlandsHow do you view the role of bio-energy and...

    23 Mar 2011
  3. The world's thirst for biofuels grows like switchgrass on the Texas prairie – a projected 133%...

    16 Mar 2011
  4. Forget water or oil, we'll run out of phosphorus first, say some. Will that spell "doom" for...

    14 Mar 2011


Related Items From Everyone


  1. The Verine Meridian combines high efficiency with distinctive European stylingDesigned to fit...

  2. Cross party support for the new UK Green Bank has reigned in, despite election politics. With the...

    06 Apr 2010
  3. LED lights reduce CO2 emissions by up to 65%

    10 Aug 2009
  4. Careful , you need a lot of power to charge in seconds. If it during peak time of day it can...

    09 May 2009
  5. This is part of my dream Project at ANERT. The Project was titled as "the Electrification of...




Go To Home

Resource Links

We're social: View Available Feeds Find out more! Leave us your feedback

RSS



We appreciate all feedback. Please leave as much or as little as you like about any aspect of this website.

If your message requires a response, please leave your email address.