Discussion Replies
|
|
wrote:
The 22% cut on 1990 levels gives the impression we've been on the right track for a couple of decades. This is not the truth. The cuts from 1990 happened in the early 90's, under the Conservative Government as the coal industry collapsed and the 'dash for gas' replaced coal for electricity. Over the 2nd decade since 1990, under the Labour Government, emissions have increased.
Read more:
|
|
wrote:
I thank Mr Vernon for his research which I have no difficulty in believing. I also notice that there just happens to be a picture of a "windfarm" adjacent. This could possibly give the impression that the "cuts" are in some way related. Both are lies. "Modern wind turbines" as the halfwit con-artists who promulgate the things call them, take several hundred years to return the energy expended in creating them. They are objet d'art, and nothing more. A very well designed wind turbine-alternator device - TAD - can readily return some 5% of its cost, annually, and if anyone is interested, I will send the reasons why this 5% I quote is about 40 x that returned by the devices in the picture. bertdotwindonatgmaildotcom.
|
|
|