› 
 › 

Posted by David Lockie on 18 Dec 2009

The Low Carbon Economy Launch beta ‘Open Carbon Data Platform’ in Partnership with UNEP

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog8257

At a meeting at COP15 in Copenhagen this week between The Low Carbon Economy Ltd and the United Nations Environment Programme, it was agreed to launch the first phase of the Open Carbon Data Platform - an online database of international energy, climate and carbon data developed by the Parties.

The first phase of the project is now live and contains approximately 750,000 pieces of data from 11 datasets from 7 data providers and includes data for EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!

To view the home page of the platform click this link:

http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/Open_Carbon_Data_Platform/Data/Home

To view country specific information click here:

http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/Open_Carbon_Data_Platform/Data/Countries

For more information on the background of the project click this link:

http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/Open_Carbon_Data_Platform/About

This is the first phase of the project with so much more to come. We hope you find this as interesting and useful as we intend it to be. We are very interested in hearing from you so if you have any feedback please email dl@lowcarboneconomy.com


Posted by David Lockie on 04 Dec 2009

The Low Carbon Economy Ltd sign MOU with the United Nations Environment Programme to develop online database of climate and energy profiles

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog8109

This week The Low Carbon Economy Ltd (TLCE) completed of the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), collaborating on the development of an online database of Climate and Energy Profiles.

The idea behind this platform was conceived at the 2008 United Nations Conference of Parties (COP14) event in Poznan (Poland). By listening to many speeches by energy ministers from numerous countries in the high level segment of the event, Toddington Harper Managing Director of The Low Carbon Economy Ltd (TLCE) became aware of the depth of valuable information being made available and the advantages that could be gained by centralising it and making it freely available to anyone who could benefit from access to it.

The concept was put to Mr Achim Steiner, Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme, who immediately recognised the benefits this opportunity could deliver, and the project developed from there. It was also put to Mr Steiner that as TLCE have a background in centralising and making available information for the Private Sector, by creating this additional resource of Public Sector information we would then have the foundations to assist with international collaboration and public-private partnerships.

By working with UNEP’s very helpful staff in Nairobi throughout 2009 TLCE and UNEP have signed a Memorandum of Understanding to cooperate on the project. Though the actual site will not be live until next week, you are able to see an example of the type of information that will be available here:
www.lowcarboneconomy.com/opencarbondataplatform.html

The original idea continues to evolve as we develop the project. This is particularly driven by David Lockie TLCE’s Development Director. A significant development is the understanding that the more easily we can make the raw data available to others, the more we can help other people add value to the process we have initiated. As a result wherever possible we are making all data available in formats that can be simply used by others for various purposes, the most useful of which we will also be featuring on the platform.


Posted by David Lockie on 13 Nov 2009

2nd Year Anniversary Celebration and Offer

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog7831

December 1st will mark the second anniversary of www.LowCarbonEconomy.com . It’s hard to believe how much has been accomplished in this time, and to celebrate our second birthday we are announcing that every company who purchases new Credits over the next 2 weeks will have their investment doubled!

Here’s some quick stats for you:

  • Google currently has over 1,000,000 of our pages in their index
  • We are by far the largest website in the UK low carbon marketplace
  • The UK Government have referenced www.LowCarbonEconomy.com in their Low Carbon Industrial Strategy
  • Our database has over 25,000 people and 1150 companies registered
  • We receive over 50,000 unique visitors per month!


Here’s the deal: For every £1 you add to your account (min £250 max £1000), we double it, meaning your budget will be doubled at no extra cost to you, it’s that simple!

With the Copenhagen COP 15 rapidly approaching we are already seeing a significant amount of additional interest in the site related to all aspects of The Low Carbon Economy so fortunately you don’t have to wait until after Copenhagen to start reaping the results!

If you are already registered on the site all you need to do is log-in, visit the payment centre and proceed from there. Once you have made your payment we will automatically double it!!

Or if you prefer just simply call us or send us an email (paul.griffin@lowcarboneconomy.com) letting us know you are interested and we will give you a call to discuss the details.

What should you do now?

Either: Call us, on 0845 31 31 711 and ask about the “2nd Year Anniversary Offer”
Or: Log into your account and purchase Credits via the ‘Payment Centre’ option located in the ‘My Account’ tab, and we will double your investment!

Discussion Replies

Offer Extended

f-cell Symposium wrote:
Offer extended due to popularity. This will now run up until the Copenhagen summit has closed.

Posted by David Lockie on 18 Sep 2009

LowCarbonEconomy.com Used to Help Design MSc Course

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog7215

A little while back, we received an email from Dr. Richard Greenough, a Principal Lecturer at the Institute of Energy and Sustainable Development , De Montfort University (Leicester, UK). He told us that he'd found LowCarbonEconomy.com useful in designing a new MSc course that he plans to introduce in 2010.

Naturally, we were interested to find out more, and thought you might all be too. So, here's a quick question and answer session with Dr. Greenough for those of you interested in finding out more.

We've started off with more general questions at the top, followed with more specific questions about the course. Finally, there are ways to give feedback or contact Dr. Greenough at the end.

Q Can you describe your new course at the Institute of Energy and Sustainable Development?
A IESD is part of De Montfort University and the new course is a masters degree aimed at students who work in industry or those who intend to. It will be available in September 2010 and deals with issues related to sustainability for industry, particularly energy use since this is the main thrust of current legislation designed to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. The course is relevant to manufacturing industry and other industries whose operations involve significant energy use, such as data processing, transport and logistics, healthcare, product design and retail.

Q What is the course's title?
A The working title is ‘Energy and Industrial Sustainability’ but this might change if I think of a better one or if our marketing people do!

Q What was the major impetus behind this new course? Was it students, industry or both?
A The major impetus was both, really. I have taught students on a manufacturing MSc for over 10 years and they were being asked to carry out increasing numbers of sustainability-related projects for industry that we had not prepared them for academically. I realized that we needed a new kind of multi-disciplinary MSc course to prepare our students to meet industry’s changing needs. Since then the government has announced its Low Carbon Industrial Strategy and the new legislation on the Carbon Reduction Commitment so the impetus has just grown.

Q In our initial correspondence, you said that you’d found LowCarbonEconomy.com to be helpful in composing the course. What did you find most useful about the site?
A I find the links to products useful but the best thing about the site is its dynamic nature. This is a very fast moving field and LowCarbonEconomy.com is a good way to keep up with developments.

Q Do you think that funding for sustainability courses in UK academia compares favourably with other countries?
A Funding is always a struggle, especially at present, and I don’t expect things to get easier any time soon. I believe the Germans are more generous with funding for their universities. As far as the students are concerned, we will be offering a part-time distance learning route, so they can at least study in their evenings and weekends without needing to give up work.

Q The topics you’re going to cover are in many cases particularly advanced in terms of policy and commerce, and still very much under development. Have you had to cater specifically for this dynamic nature of the subject in your course?
A Yes – I believe this will be a valuable addition to the course content as much of the new legislation simply did not exist five years ago. However we do accept that this content will date quickly and it can be a bit dry to teach so we will aim to teach underlying principles and ways to keep abreast of developments as part of a professional approach to engineering and technology.

Q What is the most important thing you want students to take away from their course with you?
A The knowledge and confidence to enable them to play a role in future industries that are part of the solution to climate change rather than contributing to the problem.

Q What kind of subjects are covered?
A The course covers three broad themes – sustainability, product life-cycles and energy. The sustainability theme will cover the economic, social and ecological aspects of industrial activity. The product life-cycles theme will cover the technologies and techniques relevant to each phase of the product life-cycle including design, material extraction and processing, manufacturing, the use phase and end of life processing. The energy theme will cover energy monitoring, energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies.

Q As this is a masters course, will applicants need to have a first degree?
A Yes – generally students will have a first degree, but we are able to accept suitable industrial experience and other qualifications in place of a degree, at the discretion of the course coordinator.

Q Can students study part-time?
A Yes – students can study part-time by attending lectures one day per week for 48 weeks spread over two years, or entirely by distance learning although this will take three years. Full-time students will attend for 2 days per week for 24 weeks over 1 year.

Q Do distance learners have to attend at all?
A They would only be required to attend the oral examination (viva) for their final project, although they are welcome to attend lectures if they wish to do so as long as they arrange this with the course leader beforehand.

Q Can students start their degree at any time of year?
A Full-time and part-time students would be expected to start in September, but for distance learners alternative start times are January or May/June.

Q Will there be examinations? For some students, it may be a long time since they studied formally and they might be nervous about revising for exams.
A No – there are no examinations. Students’ learning will be assessed through a combination of coursework and a final dissertation (thesis).

Q How many hours of study would students be expected to do?
A We normally expect students to spend about 150 hours on each module, but this varies depending on student’s past experience and affinity for each subject. The more time students can give to their studies, the better the assignments they will produce, which will be reflected in final marks.

Q Will students have to supply their own projects for the dissertation?
A For students who are working, it would normally be expected that agree a suitable project with their line manager, but this is not essential. Full time students will be able to choose one from a range of projects suggested by staff.

Q What jobs would you expect successful students to go into after completion of the course?
A Since this is a new course, we don’t have past students to discuss this with, but we would expect students to become energy managers, sustainability managers, consultants or similar. Despite the current economic situation, we expect there to be strong demand for graduates with skills in these areas and this has been confirmed in conversations with industry people. Past experience with the existing two MSc courses at IESD suggests that students always end up in jobs that satisfy their interests in sustainability.

Q Would students, be expected to buy into the view that mankind’s industrial activities are causing climate change?
A No, I don’t think so, although most of our current students and staff probably do. The main issue is that there is so much legislation designed to reduce emissions combined with the likelihood of future energy price spikes, that industry needs to reduce its use of fossil fuels wherever possible. All industries are facing these pressures, whether they believe they contributed to the problem or not. The course will explain how climate change may be seen as a great opportunity for some industries.

Q How much does it cost?
A Course fees are currently £4133 for full-time students, £2066 per year for part-time students and £1517 per year for distance learners. Fees for overseas students are higher, at £9500 for full-time students and £3167 per year for distance learners. If applicants are unsure whether they are considered EU or overseas students, we can advise. It’s more complex than you might imagine!

Q Are there any funding opportunities?
A Unfortunately these are few and far between. The Institute has a limited number of bursaries available for full time students from the EU

If you'd like to give any feedback on the course, please do so either through the discussion functionality below, or via this SurveyMonkey questionnaire .

If you'd like to contact Dr. Greenough directly, his profile page can be found here: http://www.iesd.dmu.ac.uk/staff/richard_greenough.php


Posted by Toddington on 28 Aug 2009

www.LowCarbonEconomy.com Launch Quick Introductions Service

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog7069

The service is free to use, all a person needs to do is submit an enquiry and the Low Carbon Economy Ltd will do the rest, finding suitable companies and partners based on specific needs.

Moving to a low carbon economy is complex. There are so many options – some of which we know and understand and many which we don’t. The situation is complicated further as there is no ‘one size fits all’ approach, information changes so regularly, and there are a continuous flow of new solutions into the marketplace.

As a result of all these factors combined with inherent difficulties of knowing who to contact for particular requirements, The Low Carbon Economy Ltd have launched this service to help connect people more efficiently with relevant solutions based on specific requirements.

Toddington Harper, Managing Director commented:

‘People want to make more efficient lower carbon choices, and businesses want to form new strategic relationships with the right partners, however the process of finding these contacts is often difficult and can be very time-consuming. This new offering is designed to remove communication barriers and directly connect people with the solutions and partners they are looking for.’

The service is free to use and only the businesses who receive beneficial enquiries will need to pay small fees to make ultra targeted connections.

We encourage you to try this service – and it only takes a couple of minutes to send your enquiry !


Posted by Toddington on 15 Jul 2009

How the UK Government plans to meet its ultra-ambitious carbon targets

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog6569

Today the UK Government has published its comprehensive plan for decarbonising the UK and maximising the economic benefits presented by the transition to a low carbon economy.

In order to achieve the extremely ambitious and challenging targets set out in the Climate Change Act 2008, the Government has today released four documents which explain how these targets can be reached. Please find a brief description of the documents below, together links so you can download them directly:

The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan: (a White Paper) which outlines how the UK will meet legally-binding ‘carbon budgets’, in particular a reduction in overall carbon emissions of 34% by 2020 and at least 80% by 2050. Making the transition to a low carbon economy will take strategic action by government and a comprehensive plan. This is that plan. It shows sector-by-sector what savings can be achieved and how every department across government will take responsibility. a particular figure of significance is that by 2020 40% of our electricity must come from low carbon sources. See:www.decc.gov.uk

Papers being published alongside the Low Carbon Transition Plan include:

The Low Carbon Industrial Strategy: This document produced by BIS (The Department for Business Innovation & Skills - previously called BERR, and prior to that the DTI) and DECC (The department of Energy and Climate Change) sets out steps being taken to harness the jobs and growth opportunities across the UK economy in the shift to low carbon. http://www.LowCarbonEconomy.com are specifically referenced in the document as a online resource that showcases new environmental technologies. See:http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file52002.pdf

The Renewable Energy Strategy: DECC detail how the UK will hit its target of getting 15% of energy (electricity, heat and transport) from renewable sources by 2020. In order to achieve this, 30% of electricity must come from renewable energy sources (a five-fold increase from today’s rate of ~5%), 12% of heat must be generated by renewables, and 10% of transport energy must be from renewables. See:www.decc.gov.uk

Low Carbon Transport: A Greener Future With greenhouse gas emissions from transport representing 21 per cent of total UK domestic emissions, this report sets out the contribution that transport must make to the UK's efforts in reducing emissions. It sets out the actions that need to be taken to deliver the necessary cuts in emissions and outlines how the Government is putting the building blocks in place for longer-term change for the period to 2050. See:http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/carbonreduction/low-carbon.pdf

The Low Carbon Economy Ltd are impressed at the scale of the proposals in these papers. Without question this represents a paradigm shift in business as usual, and offers the first evidence we have seen in a very long time that the UK is serious about actually addressing the challenges we face in preventing runaway climate change - by putting in-place the necessary measures to create a sustainable low carbon economy in the timeframes required.

Discussion Replies

Air Recycling Technology

ArcArt wrote:
I am not against wind generators or wind farms in the right places. But as the Government is spending so much on them surly it would be good sense to also spend a relatively small amount less than 0.1% on removing some of the waste of energy that already exists. The EU Ecovacuum project conclusion was that vacuum cleaners waste 75 % of the electricity that they consume.
A solution does exist in the form of Air Recycling Technology.
Which could actually save each year in the UK, an amount of energy equal to that generated by 800 Medium sized wind generators? That is 1.5 TWh of electricity 0.5 of a TWh more than their investment in wind generators is trying to provide.

To clarify this 1.5 TWh is worth £225,000,000 at 15p a unit and 650,000 Tonnes of CO2, Emissions. And a saving of more than 25 Twh of electricity annually is possible in the EU. Equal to £3.25 billion pounds and 13.5 million tonnes of CO2.Emissions.

In 2005 part of a £100,000 DTI grant was spent on tests that proved the viability of this system and that it could perform better on 250 Wh than a 1,400 Watt vacuum cleaner.

But now four years have gone by and nothing more has been done. And yet this project would provide jobs and a product with a World wide market
Surely a fair hearing is not too much to ask for.

Posted by David Lockie on 12 Jun 2009

New Homepage, New Social Tools and Feeds

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog6152

LowCarbonEconomy.com Goes Social!

We're really pleased to announce a new homepage and whole new suite of feeds and social features to help you get the most from LowCarbonEconomy.com.

However much you like the site (and we hope you really like the new homepage!), we thought you'd also appreciate some other ways to keep up-to-date with new content, and other ways that you can get involved.

RSS Feeds
There's always been a Low Carbon News RSS feed available, but there is now a feed for every other section on the site too! Now you don't need to visit LowCarbonEconomy.com to keep abreast of the latest:

Low Carbon Blog - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=18
Products - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=1
Services - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=2
Press Releases - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=3
Jobs - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=4
Opportunities - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=5
Case Studies - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=6
Events - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=8
Organisations - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=7
Discussions - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=9
Links & Resources - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=11
Reviews - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=13
Tips & Did You Know - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=11
Pictures - http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/getrss.xml?itemtype=14

Social Platforms
We're spoilt for choice these days with the number of different web platforms available for us to communicate with each other. Here at LowCarbonEconomy.com, we've chosen a few that can best help us to achieve our goal of making a low carbon economy happen.

You can now find us on:

Twitter - http://twitter.com/LCETweets - keep abreast of all the latest LowCarbonEconomy.com content as soon as it is added to the site.
FriendFeed - http://friendfeed.com/lowcarboneconomy - aggregates all our RSS feeds in one place!
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=5768564643 - show your friends and social network that you believe in a low carbon economy
LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1917055 - show your business network that you believe in a low carbon economy
Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/lowcarboneconomy/ - share your low carbon photos with us!
Delicious - http://del.icio.us/lowcarboneconomy.com - make use of our extensive bookmarks, covering everything low carbon!

Bookmark & Share the site
At the bottom of the site you'll find a 'Bookmark & Share' button that you can use to bookmark a page on the site, or share it with your social network. One of the biggest challenges to making a low carbon economy happen will be getting everyone engaged and interested. We hope that these tools will help you spread the message - get in touch if you think there's something else we should be doing.

Interested but not sure what this all means? Want to find out more? If it's not explained in enough detail here: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/LCE/AboutRSS , give us get in touch and we'll talk you through it.


Posted by Toddington on 05 Jun 2009

Welcoming Shell as a Low Carbon Economy Platinum Partner

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog6079

We are delighted to welcome the global energy giant Shell as a Platinum Partner in the Low Carbon Economy.

It is important to remember that there is no single solution to energy security or preventing runaway climate change, indeed the solution to both of these problems – a sustainable low carbon economy – can only be achieved through mass collaboration and change amongst all sectors of the economy.

Furthermore as we have largely a ‘carbon problem’ it is even more critical to get the participation of organisations such as the large energy companies on-board, who have the resources and ability to make real change, as without their involvement there can be no solution.

Repeating Lord Mandelson’s (UK Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform) words from the Low Carbon Economy Summit:

- ‘A Low Carbon Economy is not a sector of the economy – it is the economy’.

It is extremely encouraging that Shell have taken the step to become a Platinum Partner and raise awareness about their activities in the low carbon arena. Please make sure to look at their Profile Page on an ongoing basis as additional news, opportunities, events and additional information will be added over time.

Discussion Replies

Shell as Low Carbon?

Sadoldhippy wrote:
This is Shell who are still gas flaring in Nigeria right? How can they possibly claim to be low carbon? Is this just money talking and greenwash or what!

Reply

Toddington wrote:
Thank you for your comment. We anticipated that having Shell on the site would most likely be controversial. The point that I think is important to focus on is that we URGENTLY need a low carbon economy, and to make that happen, we need EVERYONE involved especially the people and organisations that are directly or indirectly responsible for producing the most carbon emissions...

And whilst what you are referring to doesn’t sound at all low carbon (and I am certainly not defending it), I take a different view:

If we (humans as a whole) stopped demanding the gas and oil that companies like Shell produce, they would be out of business. However as an example I use electric lights, and though I also have a bicycle I drive a car when ‘necessary’, use gas to heat my hot water, and electricity to cook with... this is all based on fossil fuels. I take equal responsibility for these carbon emissions as the company that produced the fuel! After all I paid for it! If we change the demand then the companies like Shell who want to stay in businesses will have to change their practises. I think in this particular space (whilst this may not be applicable to you) I come across a lot of ‘people in greenhouses who shouldn’t throw stones’ – i.e. its a bit like not wanting to kill animals and then eating meat or wearing leather...

Welcoming Shell

Chilledgibbo wrote:
I think it is important to welcome companies like Shell to enter the debate an work on advancing to developing low carbon energy such as producing hydrocarbons from biomass such as algae in future instead of oil. A transition from a oil based energy provider to one that uses sustainable biomass is a win-win from an energy security and also a reduced carbon perspective. This is going to have to happen sooner or later as oil supply dwindles in the future, so inevitably it is in their interests.

Being dismissive is not going do anyone any favours. It just alienates people and makes environmentalist groups appear as if ther are looking for a regression in society.

Posted by David Lockie on 08 May 2009

Future Business Workshop Write Up

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog5650

In late April, I went to a Future Business workshop entitled "Sustain Future Profits - Cut Utility Costs". These are two core tenets of a low carbon economy, so I thought I'd go along to learn some good practices and resources, and meet some like-minded businesses. The session was presented by Janette Ackroyd of Ecosys, who has kindly given me permission to publish this write up, based mostly on her presentation and resources, with my own notes added. In this write-up, I focus on 'take-home' messages, actions and resources that should be of interest to most businesses.

I'll follow roughly the layout of Janette's presentation .

Resource Efficiency & Profitability

“It is not the strongest species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the ones who are most responsive to change”
Charles Darwin

Benefits of resource efficiency

1. Saves money – typically 1% of turnover (the true cost of waste is typically 4% of turnover)
2. Bottom line benefits – it’s easier to increase profitability by reducing costs than by increasing turnover
3. Short payback periods – many measures will deliver a benefit in a month or less, and continue to keep delivering month on month.
4. Typical savings are £1000/employee
5. Low cost/no cost measures yield big results
6. Business survival – the need to base your business on long-term sustainability – e.g. New Scientist study in 2007 – the number of years left of raw materials

Resources

Envirowise: GG256 Green Officiency

Envirowise: EN030 200 Finding Hidden Profit: Tips for reducing waste

B&H Council: Towards a Low Carbon Economy: The Guide for Business in Brighton & Hove

Green Rocket: Ethical Business Guide

Waste Hierarchy, Cost of Waste

“If you don't measure, you can't manage!”

Waste Hierarchy

1. Eliminate – e.g. just stop junk mail coming through in the first place.
2. Reduce – order bulk containers of consumables you use regularly, print on both sides of paper
3. Re-use – e.g. envelopes, jiffy bags, scrap paper
4. Recycle – whatever your waste management can accept
5. Dispose

Resources

Envirowise: GG367 Waste Minimisation for Managers

Envirowise: GG707 Measure to Manage

Envirowise: EN508 Getting the most from your waste management contractor

Stop Junk Mail: http://www.stopjunkmail.org.uk/default.php

Practical Efficiency Tips

“Make sure your bins are full - could save 1/3 of waste costs!”

How to set up a company recycling scheme

1. Senior management commitment – you need this before you get started
2. Communicate the benefits to staff – motivate them to be involved!
- Cost and Environmental
3. Make it easy for everybody
- Put recycling bins in appropriate places, e.g. close to staff and photocopiers, printers, kitchens
- Clearly label bins for different materials
- Make general waste bins smaller and/or locate them centrally too
- Involve cleaning staff – they’re part of the team too!
4. Report back on performance to keep the issue in the spotlight. Reward on-target performance with incentives
5. Spot checks on general waste bins to monitor ongoing success

Waste Mapping

Follow a simple waste mapping process to identify:
• Where waste occurs
• How waste occurs
• How much it is really costing your business
• Which processes are most wasteful
• Where to start – where you can find quick wins by implementing the waste hierarchy

23 General Tips for Offices & Small Businesses

1. Reuse material e.g. waste paper for scrap pads, boxes & jiffy envelopes
2. Only print hard copy when absolutely necessary
3. Maximise use of electronic forms and marketing material
4. Use duplex printers and photocopiers
5. Operate good stock control
6. Assess whether to buy in bulk or not
7. Switch to electronic invoicing
8. Buy recycled paper and other stationary products
9. Buy recycled products or products in recycled packaging
10. Avoid disposable products
11. Buy robust, reusable products that will last as long as possible
12. Contact senders of junk mail & MPS and FPS
13. Recycle toner cartridges, paper, card, plastic bottles, cans and glass
14. Buy only what is really needed to reduce waste and stock holding costs
15. Buy locally to support the local economy & reduce transportation impacts
16. Avoid unnecessary packaging
17. Buy products that are made from (& packaged in) recyclable or
18. compostable materials
19. Replace coffee sachets with jars, and sugar sachets with bowls of sugar
20. Switch from paper towels to air hand-dryers or washable towel systems
21. Install refillable soap dispensers in the kitchen and toilets
22. Use refillable containers with environmentally friendly cleaning materials
23. Check cleaning staff use the correct concentration of cleaning agents

Energy Saving Tips

“Monitor consumption & costs”

• Check bills
• Read meters regularly
• Smart meters & plug in appliance meters
• Benchmark performance
• Out of hours consumption
• Trends of use
• Simple 7 day timers for switching off printers, etc.

Water Saving Tips

• Check for leaks by checking meters last thing at night and first thing in the morning
• Fit flow restrictors if your water pressure is too high

Be Resource Efficient With Your Time!

• Determine how much time you can allocate to resource efficiency
• Set SMART objectives
• Commit to a routine – maybe every Friday afternoon for example
• Maximise on easy wins, use these as leverage to make deeper changes
• Take small steps
• Remain focused on your SMART objectives
• Use all the help you can get

Get some funding!

Enhanced Capital Allowance scheme can provide funding for (and provides a list of) approved products and suppliers for certain energy and water saving technologies:

Energy saving products
Water saving products

For renewable technologies the Low Carbon Buildings supplier list is a good starting point :

http://www.lowcarbonbuildings.org.uk/micro/

Ecosys Contact Details

Website: http://www.ecosys.org.uk/
Email: admin@ecosys.org.uk
Tel: 01273 245587


Posted by Toddington on 03 Apr 2009

The impact of the G20 Communiqué on the Green Economy

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog5183

Yesterday (2nd April 2009) the leaders of the ‘Group of 20’ met at the London Summit and signed the what is being referred to as a historic agreement.

To help you easily access the information in the document which is relevant to a Green Economy, we have stripped it out here:

4. We have today therefore pledged to do whatever is necessary to:

- Restore confidence, growth, and jobs;

- Repair the financial system to restore lending;

- Strengthen financial regulation to rebuild trust;

- Fund and reform our international financial institutions to overcome this crisis and prevent future ones;

- Promote global trade and investment and reject protectionism, to underpin prosperity; and

-Build an inclusive, green, and sustainable recovery.

Restoring growth and jobs

6. We are undertaking an unprecedented and concerted fiscal expansion, which will save or create millions of jobs which would otherwise have been destroyed, and that will, by the end of next year, amount to $5 trillion, raise output by 4 per cent, and accelerate the transition to a green economy. We are committed to deliver the scale of sustained fiscal effort necessary to restore growth.

27. We agreed to make the best possible use of investment funded by fiscal stimulus programmes towards the goal of building a resilient, sustainable, and green recovery. We will make the transition towards clean, innovative, resource efficient, low carbon technologies and infrastructure. We encourage the MDBs to contribute fully to the achievement of this objective. We will identify and work together on further measures to build sustainable economies.

28. We reaffirm our commitment to address the threat of irreversible climate change, based on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, and to reach agreement at the UN Climate Change conference in Copenhagen in December 2009.

... In our view is this is very encouraging - especially considering that in the run up to the conference it seemed there was a good chance that an agreement was not going to be reached at all, let alone with such clear consensus.

Let’s hope that in Copenhagen, where it really matters, a clear agreement will also be reached.

Download the PDF here:
http://www.londonsummit.gov.uk/resources/en/PDF/final-communique


Posted by Toddington on 06 Mar 2009

Report on the UK ‘Low Carbon Industrial Strategy: Vision’

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog4784

This morning we attended the ‘Low Carbon Economy Summit’, where the UK Government formally launched the ‘Low Carbon Industrial Strategy: Vision’.

I witnessed what is most certainly the governments strongest, and inspiring commitment yet to making a low carbon economy happen – both in the UK and abroad.

Among those present included Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Business Secretary Lord Peter Mandelson, and Energy and Climate Secretary Ed Miliband. For your benefit I captured a number of statements which I think you will find interesting, insightful, and valuable:

Prime Minister Gordon Brown:

‘A low carbon economy is not a cost to be borne but a prize to be won’

‘People who build the present on the images of the past will miss out on the opportunities of the future’

‘I believe this is a challenge tailor made for Britain’

‘Millions of the jobs of the future can be low carbon, green jobs’

‘We must be the first of the low carbon powers’

‘Cooperation towards a low carbon economy is essential’

‘I hope that a partnership for a low carbon future can be built’

‘President Obama and I discussed urgent need to sign new Kyoto agreement in Copenhagen’

‘The united states is now on the transition path to a low carbon economy with a n 80 percent reduction in carbon emissions by 2050’

‘We will use the upcoming meeting of the G20 to pave the way for a global Green New Deal’

‘Global environmental industries are worth 4 trillion dollars and expected to grow by 45pc over the next 8 years’

‘This opportunity will create 400,000 new jobs in the UK over the next 8 years – an annual growth rate of 5 percent each year’

‘I ask for you all to join with us now to make a low carbon economy happen’

Lord Peter Mandelson

‘We are on the edge of a low carbon industrial revolution’

‘Everything is going to change’

‘The transition to a low carbon economy is an economic and environmental imperative - and is inevitable’

‘The low carbon shift represents huge opportunities for the UK in two ways - billions in cost savings’ via energy efficiency, and low carbon is already a £3 trillion industry and set do double in size’

‘What we need to do is keep ahead of the curve’

‘A low carbon economy is not a sector of the economy - it is the economy’

Ed Milliband

'We need both industry and government to make this happen'

'The shift to low carbon in the UK, and around the world is now largely inevitable. What is not inevitable is that Britain benefits industrially from the transition'

'We want to mobilise every bit of expertise and ingenuity that Britain has to offer'

My Question:

At this point I had the opportunity to directly ask the panel a question, which was along the lines of:

‘Many from the scientific community believe that 450ppm of GHG emissions could be the global tipping point of no return... as we are currently over 380ppm with emissions still rising and at this rate set to rise to over the 450ppm point within the next 10 years – surely what we need now are immediate policies that make a difference today, rather than for example focussing primarily on new nuclear power plants which cannot be built for at least 10 years? (and which only start to produce low carbon energy when they are turned on, and until that point in their construction release huge amounts of GHG emissions)

Both Energy and Climate Secretary Ed Miliband and Prime Minister Gordon Brown replied respectively:

‘We must pursue all options’

‘The faster we can move on all options the better’

Nick Stern was also present and gave his views:

‘The key point is that the costs of inaction are immense... in the stern review we underestimated’

‘Low carbon growth is very attractive and has lots of advantages including safety, energy security and climate change’

‘We can see very clearly why we have to do this... We must manage the transition - we are going to have to make tough decisions - this is the growth story of the next 2 to 3 decades - but on an even bigger scale than ever before’

‘Consumer and community demand is critical - thus we must foster that demand - a lot of this is dependant on communities acting together - consumers and communities are the basic source of demand’

‘We are well placed in our skills to take a lead but if we fall behind it will be damaging’

‘It does not matter where in the world the carbon is emitted - it has the same effect’

‘What we have to do is not only take on strong targets - we must also show that low carbon growth is possible - only then will developing countries take on low carbon growth’

Additional information on the Low Carbon Industrial Strategy can be found at the following link:

http://www.hmg.gov.uk/lowcarbon

Disclaimer: Though the author was present at the Summit and made all efforts to record accurate notes of the event, we do not claim that all statements are precise or accurate.

Discussion Replies

How can we comunicate

ArcArt wrote:
All very interesting to know what they say but how do I get them to listen to what I know about energy saving.

For instance what do they know about Air Recycling Technology? Yet it could save 1.5 Terawatt of electricity a year in the UK alone that is worth about £225,000,000. at 15p a unit and 650,000 Tons of CO2 Emission

The total annual EU energy consumption of Vacuum Cleaners is estimated as 33.45 Twh so by using air recycling technology ART, a saving of more than 25 Twh of electricity annually is possible in the EU. Equal to £3.75 Billion pounds and 13.5 million tonnes of CO2. Annually.

But does anyone really care? http://www.edginton.info/arc
Benjamin.

Posted by EcoDan! on 27 Feb 2009

Maldives; New Government; New Opportunities

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog4671

The Maldives is the world’s newest democracy. The country held multi party elections for the first time in November 2008, which ushered in the progressive and business friendly president, Mohammed Nasheed.

The Maldivian’s are particularly interested in getting their fledgling nation up and running by opening up investment opportunities in three areas.

• Real Estate
• Transport
• Utilities

The setting up of Special Economic zones with attractive incentives and long term leasing arrangements are now in place to stimulate investment and drive growth in the nation. One thing that is particularly refreshing about the entire programme is the environment and global warming concerns are especially high on the agenda. More over it is entwined into everything they do. They have expressed they desire to be “an incredibly low carbon nation” and this ethos permeates not only utilities but all sectors.

Plans are afoot to significantly diversify the economy into shipping, information technology and offshore banking in the next phases. A few more key points to note is they are operating under a principle of business knows business, as such are not seeking any government stakes in investments. Projects can be 100% financed by foreign money and run in the same manner. The Vice President Dr. Mohamed Waheed Hassan Manik is operating on a zero tolerance policy towards corruption within government, something he stakes his office on.
Recognising that their environment is currently delivering 28% of their GDP (namely from tourism), not only do they greatly respect it but they desire to preserve it for the future generations and prosperity. There are a number of opportunities open to companies utilising low carbon and sustainable practises:

• Centres of excellence for renewable and marine research.
There is an interest in setting up academic exchange programmes with other universities in both marine sciences and renewable engineering faculties. All students please do not instantly apply now.

• Centre piece for renewable power generation.
Currently power in supplied via diesel generators, which is something they are keen to change by moving to renewables in so ultimately becoming energy independent. With 830 MW open for redevelopment, now is the time to declare one’s interest. The sewerage is also available for use in waste to energy projects and provides a valuable resource currently untapped.

• Sustainable real estate development.
Older construction methods are harming the environment so a new approach is being taken. Many problem solving scenarios lie here due to resource scarcity, certainly an exciting challenge.

The new government has high aspirations for the Maldives and in the first 100 days in office you can see they have clearly stated their intent. Again the development opportunities arise for our sector, to truly move out of a recession we must all seek to look for the best chances to build our businesses both at home and abroad.

When we are all more positive in our approach to business and each other then the clouds of the recession will begin to part. I can certainly think of worse places to be carrying out projects and feasibility studies.

If you are interested in international projects especially the areas mentioned above please email connect@lowcarboneconomy.com


Posted by Toddington on 06 Feb 2009

Joined-up thinking from the World Economic Forum - Davos

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog4348

Last week the World Economic Forum assembled for their annual meeting in Davos, where further evidence was presented that the issues of the current economy, environment, long-term prosperity, sustainability and energy security - are all related and can therefore all be addressed ‘permanently’ by the same solution - the transition to a low carbon economy.

Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Lord Nicholas Stern and many senior business and NGO representatives issued a statement "to not let the recession become an excuse for delaying action on climate change, but rather that additional investment in low-carbon technologies can create jobs and reinvigorate the market".

The key points in the statement are summarised below:

‘Shaping an Opportunity Out of Crisis’

(A message to participants in the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2009 from Members of the Global Agenda Council on Climate Change)

1. Few other challenges are as serious for the future of humanity as climate change

2. The need to begin the transition to a low-carbon global economy has become far more urgent

3. We must innovate as we rebuild our economies during 2009

4. Let us shape an opportunity out of this economic crisis

5. There are real opportunities to stimulate jobs and growth today from investments in the low-carbon Economy

6. At the same time, a foundation for the longer term can be built

7. We believe that unprecedented multi-stakeholder collaboration is needed for 2009 to link the climate and economic agendas

8. We also believe that climate change now presents a diplomatic opportunity

(You can view the full document by following the links provided at the end of this post)

'Green Investing' Report

The recommendations also mirrored those in the report produced by the World Economic Forum entitled Green Investing, focussed on the scale of green-technology investment needed to shift to a low-carbon economy. The study suggests that at least $515 billion will have to be invested in clean energy every year between now and 2030 to keep global warming below unsustainable levels, which is over three times the amount invested last year. However it also stresses that waiting for economic recovery, rather than taking decisive action now, will make the future challenge (and costs) far greater and says "this makes sense in simple risk-management terms: deploy a small percentage of global GDP now to help ward off the risk of much larger impacts in the future.”.

Eight Emerging Large-Scale Clean Energy Sectors were identified in the report:

1. Onshore Wind
2. Offshore Wind
3. Solar Photovoltaic (PV)
4. Solar Thermal Electricity Generation (STEG)
5. Municipal Solid Waste-to-Energy (MSW)
6. Sugar-based Ethanol
7. Cellulosic and Next Generation Biofuels
8. Geothermal Power

In addition to renewable energy, four Key Enablers of a Shift to Clean Energy were also identified:

1. Energy Efficiency
2. Smart Grids
3. Energy Storage
4. Carbon Capture and Sequestration

... as well as effective Carbon Markets and the need for Smart Policy.

The report concluded that:

[i]“The need to shift to a low-carbon economy is stronger than ever. Clean energy technologies are becoming increasingly cost-competitive with fossil-based energy. A carbon price will eventually level the playing field, but in the meantime clean energy solutions require support from policy-makers.

Policy-makers need to build frameworks which enable corporations and investors to make good returns by squeezing carbon out of the world’s economy. And investors need to understand the scale and nature of the investment opportunity presented by the world’s one-time shift to low-carbon energy.

2009 is a critical year to bring these players together and start the transition toward a clean world energy infrastructure. The official UN negotiations will work on developing the overall framework for a follow on to the Kyoto Protocol by December of 2009. To complement and support this process, a platform should be created that connects policy makers (of the major economies in particular) with major investors and global energy corporations. A discussion, involving all these key players, can then take place during 2009 on how best to design the enablers identified in this report, in order to make the transition happen: a coalition of public-private expertise that designs the clean energy motor to drive the new framework forward.”[/i]

Finally I thought you would be interested in the following supporting statements:

“We cannot afford to relegate climate change to the international pending tray because of our current economic difficulties. We must use the imperative of building a low carbon economy as a route to creating jobs and growth, the path that will see us through the current downturn” - UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown

“Enormous investment in energy infrastructure is required to address the twin threats of energy insecurity and climate change. In light of the global financial crisis, it is crucial that every dollar is made to 'multi-task' to create a sustainable low-carbon economy." - Max von Bismarck, Anuradha Gurung, Chris Greenwood, Michael Liebreich

“Banking could do very well as Britain moves to a low carbon economy, there will be lots of business opportunities and Britain’s bankers are particularly strong in this area. They have been very creative over all kinds of issues and they could do it again in the financing of green initiatives." – Lord Nicolas Stern


Reference Sources:

http://www.euractiv.com/en/climate-change/davos-experts-call-multilateral-linking-economy-climate/article-179008
hhttp://ttp://www.weforum.org/pdf/climate/ClimateChange_GACmessage.pdf
http://www.weforum.org/pdf/climate/Green.pdf
http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page18190
http://members5.boardhost.com/medialens/msg/1233365407.html


Posted by Toddington on 23 Jan 2009

Review of the World Future Energy Summit 2009 – Abu Dhabi

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog4077

Abu Dhabi is a land where fairy tales can become reality, and the impossible is business as usual.

Seven emirates make up the United Arab Emirates. Dubai is perhaps the best well known, however Abu Dhabi is the one to look out for. The UAE holds almost 10 percent of the worlds oil reserves and the fifth largest natural gas reserves. Almost 95 percent of these are located in Abu Dhabi creating wealth and opportunity beyond most peoples imagination.

However whilst Abu Dhabi remains a major hydrocarbon producer, it is rapidly becoming a nexus for the transition to a Low Carbon Economy. At the centre of this is ‘Masdar’, an organization established and championed by his Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi. Masdar is positioning itself as global leaders in the push for new low carbon energy technologies and clean, sustainable ways of living to address the challenges of global warming and the ever-growing demand for energy. Leadership in both areas is needed, and Masdar is demonstrating it can deliver practical leadership by showing what can be done, and how to do it.

Masdar has numerous initiatives, working across a variety of different areas including solar wind, waste to energy, carbon capture and storage, and transport electrification. Sometimes they invest directly in projects ($15 Billion USD has already been committed to Masdar) , in other areas they are building partnerships and creating networks. At the very centre of their activities is Masdar City, the worlds very first carbon neutral city currently under construction.

A further initiative, hosted by Masdar is the World Future Energy Summit, which we attended last week and exhibited at in conjunction with UK Trade & Investment. In true Abu Dhabi style, in only its second year the event has cemented its position as the world’s largest conference and exhibition on renewable and future energy solutions, innovations, investments, policy and vision.

More than 359 exhibitors were present, and more than 16,000 people attended from 95 countries. From an exhibitors perspective the quality of people in attendance was outstanding. It is also a great place to arrange meetings as all decision makers seemed to be present.

Alongside the exhibition is an extremely active conference with numerous sessions covering everything from global strategy (including numerous government viewpoints), to finance, and of course the range of low carbon and renewable technologies. We took many pictures of the conference and will be uploading them to the site in due course.

Whilst we all must think very carefully about minimizing air travel in order to reduce carbon emissions (and for the majority of attendees there is no option), rapid progress needs to be made and new connections are needed to help make this happen. At this event, the world is in attendance, and critical connections to help Accelerate the global transition to a Low Carbon Economy get made. For people who need these types of connections we recommend you make it to next years event.

If you would like:

• To find out more about the event, please visit http://www.worldfutureenergysummit.com
• To find out more about Masdar, please visit http://www.masdaruae.com
• For us to connect you with the right person in Masdar, please email us at: connect@lowcarboneconomy.com


Posted by David Lockie on 23 Jan 2009

What the Low Carbon Economy Can Learn from Zombies

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog4074

Or Why A Fictional Zombie World War Holds Seven Lessons for Us All

An unlikely premise I know, but as I was reading 'World War Z - An Oral History of the Zombie War *' I realised that there are perhaps lessons to be learnt. The book tells the story (retrospectively through the eyes of the survivors) of a global war between humanity and the undead that starts as a few isolated outbreaks of a poorly characterised 'African Rabies' disease and in a matter of weeks becomes a global pandemic of infection, in line with typical zombie guidelines. Infection is spread when zombie 'blood' enters a living person's bloodstream. When that person dies, they reanimate as a zombie with an insatiable thirst for blood, very limited intelligence and a variety of darkly comedic disfigurements. As the infection spreads, humanity retreats to various safe zones and attempts to survive, eventually succeeding in going on the offensive and largely retaking the planet from the zombies.

So what on earth has that got to do with a low carbon economy? Perhaps the most resonant thing for me was the perspective - the fictional survivors were looking back after a global disaster. That seems a poignant juxtaposition with the situation that humanity finds itself in in 2009 with the strong possibility of global disasters (albeit probably of a different nature) in the near future.

1. Unpredictability
In the book, no one predicted or expected a worldwide uprising of the undead. Whilst there are certainly some global threats we can see looming on the horizon: climate change, flu pandemic, over-population, water/food shortages or an asteroid impact, there are surely more possible disasters than this ahead of us, particularly those of our own making. Which one(s) will hit us, when and where are all questions we just can't answer. So what can we learn from unpredictability? I guess my biggest take-home is the importance of a balanced portfolio - ensuring we don't spend so much money on war that we are unable to invest in sustainability, balancing complexity with simplicity to ensure we're not all totally dependent on international supply chains and centrally-dependent technologies and ensuring there is enough redundancy and sustainability in the things we can’t live without: the environment being a prime example.

2. Rapid Onset
Zombie infection is an exponential process. If you assume that each zombie will infect (on average) one new person, the rate of infection doubles at every iteration. In the book, the true nature of the infection is kept hidden by national leaders for reasons of 'national security'. This leads to two phenomena: the relatively paucity of resources put to preventing the spread of infection, and perhaps more crucially a delay before most of the world even knows there is a problem, let alone can start to take defensive measures. In an environment where a problem is growing exponentially, the speed of response is critical - in a medical emergency they say there is a golden hour during which time the recovery rate is significantly higher. In the case of climate change, energy security and resource management, our problems are growing exponentially (in line not only with human population growth, but in the per capita consumption of resources). We need to start acting seriously now.

3. Effective Communications
Leading on from the problem that governments were keener to hide infection outbreaks than to communicate them, the human population in the book suffers unnecessary and grievous losses which leads to 'The Great Panic' where no one knows the true nature of the infection, survival techniques or even basic information about the zombies. Different media outlets delivered conflicting messages that lead billions of people to simply 'Go North' where the freezing temperatures will freeze the zombies solid and offer some degree of protection. However, many millions of people die because they are ill-prepared for the new environment in which they find themselves. Either they didn't know what to take, it wasn't available, or they expected the provisions to be provided once they got there. To move to a low carbon economy (read low zombie economy?), we need effective, consolidated communications, worldwide. We also need to ensure that we have redundancy in communications. The internet is the ultimate communications platform – we have that on our side – but it’s not something we should take for granted.

4. Importance of Localised Sustainability
To survive, we need surprisingly few (physical!) basics: food, water and shelter and basic healthcare. It worries me how dependent so much of the UK is completely dependent on supermarkets for almost all their food and clothing, which are in turn dependent on highly complex global supply chains. As for shelter, our houses are well built, but without national gas, electricity, fresh water and wastewater infrastructures, they’re little more than draught-proof, secure caves. Surprisingly few people could put you in the recovery position correctly, let alone treat an infection or set a broken arm. In short, we’ve lost a lot of our independence as individuals and small groups – in order for our society to advance and increase in complexity, we’ve specialised. Have we got the balance right or should our education include more basic life skills such as first aid and growing food? According to World War Z, basic survival skills were the ones in shortest supply during the war and aftermath.

5. Cooperation
Working together as humans. The characters in the book are forced to redraw national borders and to cooperate closer than ever the world’s population had since humans first left Africa. There are too many of us, and our technologies are too advanced for this one planet to support an indefinite arms race within the human species. I’m not talking about saving the planet: I’m talking about saving ourselves, these astonishing civilisations we’ve built and the knowledge we’ve earned with blood, sweat and tears. We need to acknowledge that we are part god and part devil, part order and part chaos, that dominance and hierarchy are part of our heritage and to find ways to work with that nature to find positive and constructive outlets for our less positive traits and cooperate as one species. I’m not being idealistic here, there will always be conflict and struggle to some extent, but we need to ensure that the overall trend is sustainable. The book describes many isolated pockets of survivors that manage to defend against the zombies for years, with apparently sufficient physical resources to survive, yet some of which collapse through social disintegration. Was that inevitable given the effects of such stress, or could they have made it through with a different mindset and culture?

6. Crisis = Challenge + Opportunity
I know it sounds like either an HSBC ad or a semantic yin and yang symbol, but it is a universal truth. In the book, I felt that the most important opportunity was for the survivors to be able to rebuild civilisation in their own image. Some countries and international communities took the opportunity to forge strong frameworks for international cooperation and rebuilding, for airing out the social frameworks that had governed before the war. In the low carbon economy, I think our greatest opportunity is the we have the same chance: to rebuild the world in our own image. The work that we have ahead of us is formidable, yet exciting. Never have we faced so many challenges of such gravity. In both scenarios the raw capacity for innovation and problem-solving is humanity’s greatest asset.

7. Global Impact of National Decisions
The book tells how the decisions of various countries around the world affect the unfolding of the war. Some countries work hard to control information about the outbreaks, for reasons of national security, whilst others simply fail to deal with the information effectively and coordinate effective communications. The countries that deliberately hide their outbreaks are considered to have hampered the rest of the world’s ability to coordinate an effective and swift response by providing the opportunity for infected people to be smuggled across borders and thus spread the infection further. In a similar way, countries whose governments either deny the need for a low carbon economy, or are failing to provide a proactive national strategy for transition are likewise threatening the ability of the international community to tackle the challenges we face.

These seven lessons help guide and motivate us (well me anyway) here at LowCarbonEconomy.com to build a central resource for the transition to a low carbon economy. Join us and help the world fight zombies, sorry, carbon.

*Not my usual reading matter, but I quite enjoyed it!

Discussion Replies

Age of Stupid

David Lockie wrote:
Just watched this trailer for Age of Stupid - a similar idea - future generations looking back and wondering why humanity didn't save itself.

Even the BBC agrees...

David Lockie wrote:
BBC article


 
If zombies actually existed, an attack by them would lead to the collapse of civilisation unless dealt with quickly and aggressively.
 


OK so perhaps they haven't seen the whole zombie comparison yet, but in time I'm sure they will...

Posted by Toddington on 16 Jan 2009

On Your Radar - The World Future Energy Summit

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog3962

Next week the World Future Energy Summit (WFES) takes place in Abu Dhabi.

Whilst the recent United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change held in Poznan is the global meeting place for the political elite, WFES is becoming known as the equivalent event for industry.

The Low Carbon Economy Ltd are attending the event and will be sending a blog next week to keep you informed about what happened. We are expecting big things - only last year the Abu Dhabi royal family made a surprise announcement of a $15billion investment in clean technology. Notable speakers present include senior heads of industry from all corners of the globe along with many government ministers. There is also a large exhibition which we are taking part in.

We shall be writing a report on what we experience at the event and sharing this with you.

For full details check the newsletter next week.


Posted by David Lockie on 15 Jan 2009

We Sponsor a Greenpeace Competition on Jovoto

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog3938

<p>Here at LowCarbonEconomy.com, we are <a title="About the LowCarbonEconomy.com site" href="/LCE/AboutSite" class="LinksLCE1">firm believers</a> in collaboration and the power of the web to provide solutions to a wide range of problems.</p><p><a title="External link to www.jovoto.com" href="http://www.jovoto.com"><img src="/Resources/SiteImages/jovoto-logo-B.png" alt="Jovoto logo" title="Jovoto logo" /></a></p><p>We were recently given the opportunity to collaborate with an exciting Berlin company called <a title="External link to www.jovoto.com" href="http://www.jovoto.com" class="LinksLCE1 LCEExternal">Jovoto</a> - a <a title="" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowd_sourcing" class="LinksLCE1 LCEExternal">crowd-sourcing</a> platform for creative professionals. They had been approached by <a title="External link to Greenpeace International" href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/" class="LinksLCE1 LCEExternal">Greenpeace</a> to develop smart campaign ideas that communicate Greepeace's reformation concept for the German car subvention system and wanted us to sponsor the competition.</p><p>We were only too happy to do so and the competition has been running since late December. We've just received a couple of examples of the entries that are being submitted, and thought it would be nice to share them.</p><p><a title="Large version of Idea: “change your look” © by “thirdbase”, member of the jovoto community" href="/Resources/SiteImages/change-your-look.png" target="_blank"><img src="/Resources/SiteImages/change-your-look-300.png" alt="Idea: “change your look” © by “thirdbase”, member of the jovoto community" title="Idea: “change your look” © by “thirdbase”, member of the jovoto community" /></a><br />Idea: “change your look” © by “thirdbase”, member of the jovoto community.</p><p><a title="Large version of Idea: “Choice Of Youth” © by “jubiless”, member of the jovoto community" href="/Resources/SiteImages/choice-of-youth.png" target="_blank"><img src="/Resources/SiteImages/choice-of-youth-300.png" alt="Idea: “Choice Of Youth” © by “jubiless”, member of the jovoto community" title="Idea: “Choice Of Youth” © by “jubiless”, member of the jovoto community" /></a><br />Idea: “Choice Of Youth” © by “jubiless”, member of the jovoto community.</p><p>New submissions are being added daily and we're excited to see the finalists over the next few weeks, and to see how these ideas will help shape Greenpeace's forthcoming in this campaign.</p>


Posted by David Lockie on 14 Jan 2009

Interesting Things I Didn't Know About Sun Microsystems

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog3906

LowCarbonEconomy.com's latest platinum partner is Sun Microsystems. Sun's Jim Craig talked to us about their goals in the low carbon sector and I was insipred by some of what we covered to write this blog post.

Sun launched a program (Design for the Environment ) about ten years ago that covers: supply chain, energy efficiency, waste & recycling, reducing substances of concern, environmental design.

Sun will take back any electronic equipment with the Sun logo on it - beyond legislative compliance

Sun's ultra-thin client computers (Sun Ray ) has no moving parts, is about the size of a VHS video casette (anyone remember those?) , consumes just 4W of electricity (or ~40W for models with screens included) and has a mean time to failure of 22 years.

It is possible to run just about any computing environment over a Sun system - including Microsoft and Citrix, and nearly any application can be supported, e.g. Microsoft Office.

Some of the implications of Sun's thin client environment:
- no need for on-site IT support (only within the data centre)
- using smartcard technology, one can suspend a session on any computer and resume it on any other within the network at exactly the same state
- net computing requirements are much reduced, e.g. hard drive space is factored at about 1GB per user (compared to 60GB in even a low grade new laptop)
- thin client environments can be secured far more easily than a typical network as there are fewer entry points and the number of executables and application installations is far easier to control
- licensing costs can often be greatly reduced, both due to the ease of auditing software and the nature of CALs (Client Access Licenses allow for a certain number of concurrent users)
- it is possible to use a software-based thin client instead of a box like a Sun Ray - meaning that users can access their applications and files through any Java-enabled browser - this is called the Global Secure Desktop . I think the implications of the Global Secure Desktop are mammoth: we're seeing a lot of convergence from 'fat client' environments trying to achieve a similar user experience, such as cloud computing, Software as a Service, Windows Live Mesh etc. Sun already has everything in place to be able to provide that experience and are currently exploring potential routes to the consumer market.

About 80% of the PCs in a typical organisation can be swapped for thin clients

Integration with VoiP provider Mitel and secure VPN allows for home working, and even for virtualised call centres. Some of the benefits of virtual call centres can include:
- allowing for irregular working patterns - to match demand or to enable workers such as new mothers and other persons of limited mobility to contribute effectively to the economy
- incoming calls can automatically be routed to the most local employee - important for mutual understanding and perhaps local knowledge
- reduce or obviate the need for call centre buildings - saving money, energy and load on transport networks

Sun's Jonathan Schwartz has committed the company to going open source - opening up its software and hardware to the developer community

Sun has an energy-efficient, modular data centre product (Project BlackBox ) that comes in a shipping container and is capable of not only surviving, but functioning through, a magnitude 6.7 earthquake!

Sun is a member of The Green Grid ("a global consortium dedicated to advancing energy efficiency in data centers and business computing ecosystems"). They use the Power Usage Effectiveness standard to measure their energy efficiency performance (this is essentially a standard that provides a ratio of power used for computing against the total used by the data center) and achieved an index of 1.28 in their Santa Clara data centre .


Posted by Toddington on 09 Jan 2009

Delivering the ‘Green New Deal’ in 2009

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog3838

Delivering the ‘Green New Deal’ in 2009 – A Global Perspective

I was fortunate enough to attend the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change meeting in Poznan last December.

At the event I listened intently to numerous speeches and perspectives from world leaders from many different countries and organisations and I am able to report back that:

• There is strong consensus that climate change is happening
• It is caused by mankind
• Climate change must be addressed without delay
• Solutions to climate change also represent great economic opportunities.

In particular look out in 2009 for the terminology ‘A Green New Deal’ designed to

• Create millions of jobs
• Revive the world economy
• Slash poverty
• Avert environmental disaster.

The Green New Deal draws its inspiration from Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal, which ended the 1930s depression and helped set up the world economy for the unprecedented growth of the second half of the 20th century.

Already this year support for the New Green Deal is evident and growing:
• Gordon Brown Promises Green New Deal to create 100,000 jobs This story on www.edie.net
• Korean $38 Bn Green New Deal to create 1M jobs This story on english.donga.com

If you want to know more about what happened at Poznan and to hear the global perspective ‘from the horses mouth', I imagine you will find my notes form the event very interesting indeed!

German Industry Perspective:

• German industry is embracing climate change as a business opportunity
• Energy efficiency and renewable energy is at the heart of our objectives
• The markets of the future are green
• German industry is very engaged
• We are committed to the goal of a low carbon society
• We support carbon trading
• We want to use the economic crisis to accelerate the transition to a low carbon economy
• We need a worldwide playing field

CEO Siemens:
• Germany is the global green export market leader
• Our green tech business is already worth 19bn Euros
• We are the green market leader
• The best solutions combine ecology and economy
• Effects of climate change will be with us forever - act together or die together
• Industry is not part of the problem, industry is part of the solution
• A long term perspective is no excuse for short term paralysis
• Climate Change presents an opportunity
• Don't judge each day by the harvest you reap but the seeds you plant
• Expand green portfolio from 19bn to 25bn in 3 years

BWM CFO:
• The future is environmentally friendly mobility
• A combination of minimum carbon emissions and max efficiency
• 'efficient dynamics'
• 25pc improvement in efficiency fm 2005 or 1995 to 2008
• 23 models under 140g/km
• 2 hybridisation and electrification of drive train
• Launching 2 x hybrids next year
• 20pc less fuel than combustion engine
• Li battery hybrid coming soon
• 'Mini E' 500 by end of 2009
• 200 to 240 miles per charge

Korea:
• Low carbon green growth is Korean country objective
President of Poland :
• Adaptation fund is the starting point for transition...
President of Tuvalu :
• Adaptation fund is key however he is worried about where it is going... I.e. Only accessible for the elite.
• We are aiming for a low carbon future...
• We have the right to exist - we want to survive as a people and a nation... and we will

Prime Minister of Sweden:
• We support a global carbon price
• An international agreement must be fair
• Swedish govt has set 500 mill available to address climate change over the next 3 years...

Yvo D Boer UNFCCC Executive Secretary:
• In this great future you cannot forget your past...
• When the world has recovered from the financial crisis it will not have recovered from climate change
• Climate Change is the greatest threat to humanity

US Congress Position
• 'Cautious optimism'
• Climate Change is a core element of Obamas agenda
• Strong support in house of representatives
• There is a lot of local US support
• Gov Bill Richardson is good supporter
• Great potential for job creation

Samoa:
• Whilst we have contributed very little to climate change we are likely to be effected greatly
• We are unable to control our destiny
• Global political will is needed
• With development partners we are working on renewable energy, energy efficiency and forestry management

Germany:
• Lets face it - Our efforts to combat climate change are inadequate
• Costs of climate change are great
• Iceburgs will not stop melting nor the seas rising just because bankers have squandered trilions of dollars
• Energy efficiency and renewable energy can create millions of jobs and growth for the future...
• Climate change protection is necessary and pays off
• Only major obstacle is financing... We must stop arguing over details
• We need mid-term targets

Japan:
• Has adopted first steps in becoming a low carbon society 'the action plan for achieving a low carbon society' - 60 to 80 pc cuts
• Every country must adopt at least 50pc cuts by 2050...
• Japan is assisting developing countries in their sustainable development under the financial mechanism called 'cool earth partnership'

EU:
• Is looking forward to engaging ASAP with a new US administration

Namibia:
• We must focus on developing a low carbon economy
• We need improved access to low carbon technologies
• We have commitment to broad based approach
• We need to take immediate decisive action now as tomorrow will be too late

Korea:
• An International market needs to be established
• 'low carbon green growth strategy'
• Investment of 200 million dollars over 5 years
• New climate change regime begins in 2013

Netherlands:
• Let us move towards a low carbon sustainable economy - 'Effectiveness, Environment Efficiency'
• I am convinced that with joined up effort we can and will combat climate change...

Equador:
• Despite being a small country we are committed to the environment
• We have an initiative to commit to keeping oil in the ground

Malta:
• We are highly susceptible to climate change
• EU recognises that investment in low carbon technologies is necessary for economic growth

US:
• Climate change is one of the greatest challenges facing the world
• We remain committed to an agreement in 2009
• We have seen the emergence of the clean tech revolution

China:
• Must follow the path of a low carbon economy
• Share vision for long term cooperative action
• We will work with others to make this conference and next years agreement in Copenhagen a success

UK:
• The costs of not acting out way the cost of acing
• We must show intent guided by science of climate change
• 2050 80pc targets
• Europe 20pc by 2020 and 30pc if an international agreement is reached
• UK to commit another £100 million to forestry
• We are determined to up the pace
• Negotiation in 2009 not discussion

Austria:
• we have to act and now
• Our efforts to combat climate change also offer great opportunities like green jobs
• We need a clear commitment

Philippines:
• We support the 80 percent targets
• My country the Philippines is usually visited by 20 storms each year - but now much worse
• We support low carbon communities...

Norway:
• We must base our decisions on science
• We must make sure that tough negotiations take place

Ban Ki Moon:
• When u want to get something done - keep it simple
• We now need to reach out and create a green new deal
• This crisis can be turned into an opportunity to transform the economy
• We are calling for political leadership
• Every country has limited budget
• We need a New Green Deal to create a New Green Economy

Achim steiner (United Nations Environment Programme)
• We need 190 nations acting as one
• We need to empower the public to partake and profile the solutions that they are developing

Pakistan:
• Climate Change poses the greatest risks to those who are least able to respond
• South Asia is being viewed as being most affected by climate change
• Pakistan has 5th largest pop in world but has relatively low carbon emissions.. However this makes no difference - they are being affected a lot by climate change

Suriname:
• One of the best kept forests in the world - contributing to the fight against climate change
• Since mid 1950s they have had strict conservation in place
• They have 30 pc of country covered by forest
• They are also likely to suffer some of the worst effects of climate change!

Costa Rica:
• Most of RE is hydro power - about 95pc now with 90pc of the projected future... However hydro is effected by climate change - dry seasons etc.. Thus RE can also be affected by CC... They need external help...

GABON : H.E. Ms. Georgette Koko, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Environment

• Time is being wasted and not enough is being done – we don’t have time

VIET NAM: H.E. Mr. Nguyen Thien Nhan Deputy Prime Minister

• Currently rice exporter of 4M tonnes
• Climate Change has the potential to reduce rice yield by 14M tonnes, which would make them a 10M tonne importer

CZECH REPUBLIC Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Environment

• Has cut emissions 25% since 1990 in line with Kyoto protocol targets
• Need to put economy on low carbon emission path

SOUTH AFRICA H.E. Mr. Marthinus Van Schalkwyk Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism

• Cannot dither because of short term economic downturn

SWEDEN H.E. Mr. Andreas Carlgren, Minister for the Environment

• A world market based on green energy and low carbon growth is the only key to a sustainable future
• The poorest people who are the least to blame are affected most
• The developed countries must take the lead and make major reductions
• Need a mid-term target 25-40%
• EU prepared to commit to 30% if international agreement reached
• We must find a pathway to a sustainable low carbon society

SWITZERLAND H.E. Mr. Moritz Leuenberger Federal Councillor, Head of the Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications

• Strong relationship with climate and financial
• We need clear rules on national and global levels
• Will commit to 20% and will even commit to 30% if other countries also agree
• Carbon reduction targets per person
• Agrees with the ‘polluter pays principle’

DENMARK, H.E. Ms. Connie Hedegaard Minister of Climate and Energy

• Momentum is building, change is coming
• Tacking climate change is not a threat to global growth – not tackling it is
• We must ensure that and agreement is made in Copenhagen – we must deliver
• This is about political choices, about political will, and about politicians making decisions
• The last mile is in front of us, it may be the most difficult... we need to make compromises where necessary

BARBADOS H.E. Mr. Denis Lowe, Minister of Environment, Water Resources and Drainage

• How will future generations judge us?
• Our generation has no excuse for delaying action
• The first generation to pass to our children a planet beyond despair
• In the face of imminent danger unlimited action can be taken
• All countries must make a contribution, but developed countries must take the lead
• Time is not on our side, science suggests we have a window of opportunity - we must act together we must act now

AL GORE

• We have to make a conscious choice
• In all of the mountain ranges of the world the glaciers are melting
• 1% increase in temperature = 10% increase in lightning
• The climate crisis will be a priority in the Obama administration...


Posted by David Lockie on 07 Jan 2009

Why Might Our Statistics Be Different From Yours?

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog3822

LowCarbonEconomy.com provides an advertising service that enables companies and organisations to promote low carbon information, solutions and business opportunities. We charge for this advertising on a pay per click basis. This means that when a visitor to LowCarbonEconomy.com clicks on an advert, that advertiser is charged a few pence.

Our business model therefore depends on accurately calculating the number of clicks that an advertiser’s adverts have received, and then charging for those clicks in line with our Valid Clicks Policy. We recently noticed through internal testing and advertiser feedback that the statistics produced through our internal systems do not always match up with the statistics generated by advertisers’ analytics tools. Indeed often the statistics seem significantly different.

We therefore undertook a thorough Life Cycle Analysis of data flow through our pay per click process in order to identify potential and actual causes of disparity.

In addition to confirming that our internal systems are functioning correctly, we discovered that Google Analytics (a very commonly-used, free, online analytics tool) is surprisingly unreliable. In all our tests, Google Analytics failed to achieve greater than 91% accuracy. In the case of Traffic Sources, we found the life cycle accuracy to be less than 50%.

Our conclusion is that it is important not to rely on Google Analytics alone, but to employ alternate methods of analysis or verification wherever possible.

Download the full study as a PDF

Please Note

This study was completed with a relatively small (but still statistically significant) sample size. It's not intended as an authoritative study of Google Analytics, and it's definitely not a Google-bashing exercise.

Discussion Replies

An Update!

David Lockie wrote:
In further testing using real-world data, we have a couple of interesting new findings, but nothing that changes our conclusions.

In a sample size of ~2000, we found that our own Google Analytics verified our click throughs only 85% of the time. That's a drop from our initial 'closed system' where we found 90% accuracy. We speculate that the causes could be network connectivity issues, JavaScript-disabled browsers, failure for the page to completely load before an ad is clicked, or some combination of all three.

In a smaller sample size of real world testing with some of our testing partners' sites, we found that Google Analytics' Referring Sites feature was (as with our initial testing) highly variable in its results. One test site saw only 50% of the visits as being referred by us, whereas another site (with a larger sample size) saw 135% of visits we sent over as having come from us. After a bit of digging around, the only suggestion we have here is that some of the clicks we filter out as having come from bots, spiders or user agents were not filtered out by Google Analytics.

So, overall our initial conclusion remains: one cannot rely 100% (and maybe not even 90%) on the accuracy of Google Analytics. In the case of Referring Sites data, we confirm that the discrepancies are often even larger.

We'd welcome any feedback on this study, from our advertisers or elsewhere.

Posted by David Lockie on 04 Dec 2008

LowCarbonEconomy.com Zeitgeists Dec '08

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog3556

I stumbled across a site/utility called Wordle today and thought I'd take the opportunity to have a look at what we've been building over the last year in terms of subject matter.

The first LowCarbonEconomy Wordle is for our RSS news feed:<br><a href="http://www.wordle.net/gallery/wrdl/360843/LowCarbonEconomy.com_Zeitgeist_December_2008" title="Wordle: LowCarbonEconomy.com Zeitgeist December 2008" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.wordle.net/thumb/wrdl/360843/LowCarbonEconomy.com_Zeitgeist_December_2008" style="padding:4px;border:1px solid #ddd"></a><br>

The second is for our delicious.com account (www.delicious.com/lowcarboneconomy.com) where we keep interesting bookmarks we find:<br><a target="_blank" href="http://www.wordle.net/gallery/wrdl/360851/LowCarbonEconomy.com_Delicious_Zeitgeist_December_2008" title="Wordle: LowCarbonEconomy.com Delicious Zeitgeist December 2008"><img src="http://www.wordle.net/thumb/wrdl/360851/LowCarbonEconomy.com_Delicious_Zeitgeist_December_2008" style="padding:4px;border:1px solid #ddd"></a><br>



Cool huh?


Posted by David Lockie on 29 Nov 2008

How Can We Encourage Behavioural Change?

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog3507

The specific context of this is how we can help address electrical demand peak shaving in the national grid through the use of home automation - from a session at Homecamp (http://homecamp.pbwiki.com/ ) held at Imperial College, London (29th Nov 08).

The conversation can be summarised in keywords:

Visualisation, Ambition, Targets, Context, Social Pressure, Rewards, Groups, Emotional, Crisis, Hearts & Minds, Examples, Convenience, Privacy, Sharing, Appropriate

This would seem like a good textual toolbox for any kind of behavioural change. If anyone's got any thoughts, let's grow or consolidate the list as appropriate.

Discussion Replies

More from HomeCamp

David Lockie wrote:
On behalf of andysc:

Joe Short - http://dynamicdemand.co.uk - shows fluctuations in frequency, which shows demand/supply imbalance. Use that to drive behaviour, knowing if there's power surplus or famine - fridge should be making decisions based on supply/demand in the grid

have a daily target for energy use, and turn your orb red when you hit it at whatever time in the day

what motivates people to use less? peer pressure can turn some people off
money in your pocket is good! not knowing how "bad" you are until you compare

near-death experience drives change

Posted by David Lockie on 28 Oct 2008

I speak to Arne Hulstein at Web 2.0 Expo

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog2805

I spent most of last week in Berlin at the Web 2.0 Expo, learning how we can improve LowCarbonEconomy.com. I came away truly inspired and more sure than ever that the site has an important part to play in the future of the web, and the future of energy.

Arne Hulstein was at the event, giving companies the chance to get the word out about their company and how they're using the web. He was kind enough to give me a five minute slot to talk about LowCarbonEconomy.com.

Here's Arne's blog post about all the pitchstops - I'm the last one, so keep scrolling to find it http://www.arnehulstein.nl/2008/10/27/web-20-expo-berlin-the-pitchstops/

If you click on the youtube link, you'll be able to watch me in all my (somewhat nervous) glory!


Posted by David Lockie on 10 Oct 2008

Notes from Bioenergy 2008

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog2502

I attended the Renewable Energy Association's Bioenergy 08 event in Birmingham this week.

I took some notes on the sessions I attended and thought they might be of interest to the LowCarbonEconomy.com readership.

There was a good breadth and depth of presentations, and I hope my notes will encourage you to download the presentations from the REA website and learn more in what is an important and interesting area of the energy sector.

Download the PDF here

I apologise in advance for any mistakes or inaccuracies but hope you find this useful.


Posted by Toddington on 12 Sep 2008

Obama or McCain - Who is the best candidate to lead us out of climate catastrophe?

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1910

Climate change is happening – that fact at least is something that no one disagrees with. The ice is melting much faster than forecast, and barely a day now goes by when we do not hear a new development telling us how quickly the earth’s climate is changing.

There is also now broad consensus (at least amongst the well informed scientific community) that the reasons behind such changes are due to increased emissions of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere (in particular carbon dioxide), released by burning increasing quantities of fossil fuels.

As the United States was until recently the largest emitter of greenhouse gases (recently overtaken by China) and is still the largest emitter per capita, the challenge of how to minimise further disruption to the climate lies with whoever it is that gets elected to the white house, and the policies that they instigate.

Having read a number of sources (quoted at the end) it is pretty clear who I would put my faith in. The following information describes specific subjects and views from the respective nominees camps:

Cap & Trade:
Both candidates agree in implementing a system that limits the overall amount of pollutants that are allowed to be emitted. McCain proposes 60% reductions by 2050, Obama 80% reductions (a level most scientists advocate). There is also a difference in approach - McCain proposes starting with some free allowances with the plan to auction at least some of them eventually. Obama proposes ‘A 100 percent auction ensures that all large corporate polluters pay for every ton of emissions they release, rather than giving these emission rights away for free to coal and oil companies’

Verdict: 1-0 to Obama

Obama’s Priority - Energy Efficiency:
Obama’s priority puts energy conservation as the top of the list as it is the "fastest, cleanest way to reduce emissions." He proposes dramatic improvements in the energy efficiency of buildings, including all federal buildings, homes and businesses.

McCain’s Priority – Nuclear energy:
John McCain prioritises the rapid construction of 45 nuclear energy plants by 2030 with the ultimate objective of building 100. ‘Nuclear power is a proven, zero-emission source of energy, and it is time we recommit to advancing our use of nuclear power," says his policy outline.’

(Perhaps what Mr McCain is overlooking is that such a focus on nuclear energy will mean that funds which could otherwise be used to deliver immediate sustainable benefits like energy efficiency, will be ploughed into the construction of reactors that take many years to build, emit enormous amounts of greenhouse gases in their construction, and as uranium is not a renewable resource, delay the same type of problem we have today for future generations to have to deal with)

Verdict: 2-0 to Obama

Fuel Economy Standards:
Obama proposes to double fuel efficiency (mileage) requirements for vehicles within 18 years. In order to protect domestic automakers and parts manufacturers during that transition, he offers tax credits and loan guarantees

McCain says ‘the standards already set by congress should be enforced’

Verdict: 3-0 to Obama

Renewable Energy:
Although McCain says that he supports renewable energy, he has not set specific targets. John McCain’s website (JohnMcCain.com) makes no mention of solar, wind, renewable energy, or even public transportation under the section on climate change and has no section on energy.

By 2025, Obama would like 25% of U.S. electricity to be generated from clean, renewable sources including wind, solar and geothermal with a Renewable Portfolio Standard. Obama calls for $150 billion to be invested over 10 years in clean energy, infrastructure to support it, and possibly nuclear energy.

Verdict: 4 – 0 to Obama

What about vice presidents?
Sarah Palin has stated ‘that she does not believe global warming to be human-caused’

Joe Biden states “Climate, energy, security – these are all facets of a single challenge. A strong domestic and international response that increases our energy security, that slows, stops and reverses the buildup of greenhouse gases – that policy will make us more secure.”

Verdict: 5-0 to Obama

So in Summary:
Whilst both John McCain and Barack Obama both represent positive change in comparison to the incumbent administration, it is clear that Obama offers the ‘breath of fresh air’ (pun intended) that we require to lead us out of our present predicament.

In retrospect it is hard to imagine how John McCain, a man that voted 95% of the time in the senate with George Bush, could so suddenly deliver the frame of mind we require to address the enormous challenges we face. I would be very interested in hearing your thoughts...

Reference Materials:

http://www.minnpost.com/stories/2008/09/11/3432/climate_change_getting_the_attention_of_both_parties

http://www.environmental-expert.com/resultEachPressRelease.aspx?cid=4791&codi=37031&idproducttype=8&level=0

http://biden.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/BidenRecordClimate.pdf

http://www.triplepundit.com/pages/mccain-and-obamas-plans-to-com-003294.php

http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/is_it_true_john_mccain_voted_with.html

Discussion Replies

No-brainer?

lowcarbonranger wrote:
Lets hope the American people are aware and responsive to these facts...

world responsibility...

Mistral wrote:
I hope the U.S.A citizens recognize their responsability, in this matter and give a strong vote to the Democrat candidate, because what hapend in America affects us all.
Europeans have showed their suport to Obama...

Nuclear Limits

David Lockie wrote:
Posted by David Lockie on behalf of a response received by email:

The debate re: Mcain and Obama is further pointed with the fact that there is not enough known reserves of uranium to support an increase in use, the removal of billions of tones of overburden to get to the lesser grade yellow cake, known reserves will last 10/15 years, an increase in consumption will decrease this to something less.

Comparison of energy platforms

David Lockie wrote:
Posted by David Lockie on behalf of an email correspondent

Perhaps your readers would enjoy seeing my comparison of the Obama and McCane energy
platforms, at: http://www.gatech.edu/energybuzz/
Best regards. Marilyn

Posted by Toddington on 22 Aug 2008

Why we must move to a low carbon economy

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1696

Why we must make the change to a low carbon economy now!

Mankind is at a turning point. The inconvenient truth is that we cannot sustain our current direction for a number of reasons:

• Energy security – Our global reserves of fossil fuels in particular oil and natural gas, are being rapidly depleted

• Climate Change – Is happening and being accelerated due to burning fossil fuels

• Global Population – Is rapidly expanding, increasing demand on limited natural resources

Any one of these harsh realities means that if society is to continue to function in the way we have become accustomed to, change must happen - and sooner rather than later - because whilst making the necessary changes today offers considerable opportunities, failing to adapt puts mankind at a great strategic and commercial disadvantage. Moreover, the longer we wait, the harder and more expensive the situation becomes to address.

Fortunately there is a solution which enables us to address all three challenges. It is to make the global transition to a resource efficient low carbon economy based on renewable and low carbon energy sources. Why?

• Energy security – Renewable energy harnessed from sources such as the wind, and the sun, is in abundant supply, and will never run out. Every country on every continent has access to renewable energy. Diversifying our energy mix will also enable our fossil fuel reserves to last longer, and to be used for non-energy related purposes (such as plastics and useful chemicals)

• Climate Change – There is no doubt that climate change is happening at an unprecedented rate, and there is broad consensus in the scientific community that it is caused by releasing considerable amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, by burning fossil fuels. We currently have approximately 387 parts per million (ppm) of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and that figure seems certain to exceed 400ppm or even 450ppm within the next 10 years. It is widely believed that this concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will create such a substantive warming effect that it will trigger ‘feedback mechanisms’ – such as the release of vast quantities of methane (which is 21 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide) stored in Siberian permafrost. Feedback mechanisms further disrupt the earths natural cycles, and opinion is building that when these mechanisms are activated, we will have reached the climatic point of no return. In a low carbon economy we can minimise the amount of greenhouse gases being released into the atmosphere.

• Global Population: WWF and BioRegional’s ‘One Planet Living’ study has demonstrated that countries such as the United Kingdom are consuming resources as if we had 3 planets worth to sustain us, and countries such as the United States are living a 5 planet lifestyle. On the current trajectory, by 2050 countries with quickly developing economies such as China and India will also be consuming resources in a similarly unsustainable manner. In the same time period, the human population which is currently about 6.5 Billion people (it was only 2.5Billion people in 1950!) is looking to increase to about 9.5 billion people. As we have infinite demand, finite available resources (and a changing global climate), it is critical that we use what we have as effectively as we can including reducing, reusing, and recycling as much as possible.

So to conclude:

We have impending problems which cannot be ignored, and will only get worse the longer we leave them.

As the problems are related, fortunately so is the solution – to make the transition without delay, to a sustainable resource efficient Low Carbon Economy.

Addressing these challenges is a win-win scenario, and there are considerable opportunities for all those who embrace this as a unique opportunity.


Posted by David Lockie on 30 Jun 2008

LondonAware ’08 Event Review and Competition Winner

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1345

Last weekend at the Barbican Centre, the inaugural LondonAware’08 event took place in Hall 1, organised by the team at UK Aware .

The Low Carbon Economy Ltd were proud to be main sponsors of the event, and to exhibit for both days.

We were impressed by a number of things at the event: the diversity of visitors, the quality of organisation and the feeling that this was the start of a new community as well as a new event.

There was a really healthy mixture of exhibitors, from high street brands through to green specialists and very small organisations just starting out or working not for profit. Importantly, there was something to learn from each stand, and we really felt that embodied the spirit of a low carbon economy. In many ways, it’s really an ideas economy, an analytical thinking economy that we need. One in which we improve our lives through efficiency and living sustainably.

Although I didn’t attend any of the speaking sessions (too busy just walking around meeting everyone), they were well-attended and lively.

And so, what you’ve all been waiting for: the results of our ‘Win a model fuel cell car competition’! And the winner is: Noelia Barquero S., Sales Manager, Alara Wholefoods Ltd

Well done Noelia, we hope you enjoy the fuel cell kit!

We’ll hope to support UK Aware’s future events, and recommend them if you’re interested in green ideas for everyday living.


Posted by David Lockie on 30 Jun 2008

Come and visit our stand at LondonAware '08 this weekend

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1344

The inaugural LondonAware event is on at the [url=http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=barbican+centre&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=9.196152,29.355469&ie=UTF8&z=16]Barbican Centre{/url] Hall 1 this weekend (10th and 11th May). The Low Carbon Economy stand is all set up and ready to receive visitors, we've got our business cards at the ready and we're keen to show people what we do and how we think it can help you.

We're on stand number 42, so if you're around central London this weekend and want to find some green ideas for everyday living (the show's slogan), then drop in. We had a sneak peak at some of the stands yesterday afternoon whilst we were setting up, and they look fantastic. It's going to be a great event, and a really solid foundation for future events, both in London and around the country.

If you need any more good reasons to come along, I've got two right here. First, by dropping your contact details or business card in our bowl, we'll enter you into a competition to win a fuel cell car kit. The second reason is that we've got a limited number of free credit vouchers worth £50 when you spend £250 or more on advertising credit for use on
www.lowcarboneconomy.com . "A competition for a fuel cell car and free credit, all on one stand?" I hear you ask: Yes - that's right, so come on down and visit us at the Barbican centre this weekend.

We'll add a post-event review here next week for those of you who can't make it along this time. As a very special offer, we've decided to extend our voucher goodwill to people who read our blog. We're going to save 5 vouchers (worth £50 when you spend £250) to give away to the first five people to leave comments on this post asking for one. They need to be used by the end of May, so write now!


Posted by David Lockie on 30 Jun 2008

Free Tickets for LondonAware '08

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1343

Please join us at LondonAware '08 - "Green Ideas for Everyday Living" - with these free tickets courtesy of the organizers and LowCarbonEconomy.com .

This promises to be one of the most exciting events of the year, with thousands of people and businesses under one roof in the Barbican centre, London on the 10th-11th May.

LowCarbonEconomy.com are proud to be main sponsors of the event, we hope that you will be able to attend and to meet us there if we haven't met before.

Please leave comments on this post, or email us for your free tickets. There aren't many though, so don't delay - when they're gone, they're gone.


Posted by David Lockie on 30 Jun 2008

Jeremy Leggett’s 22 reasons why Peak Oil is real

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1342

Last night, I attended “Energy & Resources for the Transition to a Sustainable Future”, a talk in Brighton organized by www.transitionbrightonandhove.org.uk (on 18/04/08).

One of the speakers was Jeremy Leggett. Below is my transcript of his talk, the presentation for which will be made available as soon as possible.

I believe that the peak oil theory is likely to be proven over time, simply because anything (however plentiful) in or on our planet is a finite resource. At 20 million barrels of oil per day, we’re consuming this particular resource really quickly and so far the only known natural mechanisms for the creation of oil occur over geological timescales. However, I believe that peak oil, climate change, resource/environmental management and energy security are all good enough reasons on their own to transition to a low carbon economy, so the purpose of this post isn’t to persuade but to publicise the issues at stake and help empower people to make up their own mind.

The links added are my own, as are any mistakes or omissions.

The Coming Energy Famine – why we must act ahead of peak oil by Jeremy Legget – Chief Executive of Solar Century

Jeremy said that he has recently returned from Malawi where he was visiting with SolarAid – a charity supported by SolarCentury. When he was there, he saw a wind turbine that was made by a twelve year-old boy from a bicycle frame and a wooden tower because his dream was to supply his home village with electricity. The point is that renewable energy is not rocket science, it’s something well within our means.

He predicted that the issue of Peak Oil will be a massive in the press in 2008, like climate change has been in 2007.

His 22 arguments of why peak oil is real:

  1. More whistleblowers from within/around fossil fuel industry emerging every week – IEA say three countries vital to global fossil fuel supplies: Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran. Peak oil believers include James Schlesinger - former US Energy Secretary and former head of CIA. Nigeria could lose 30% of production in the very near future without immediate action.
  2. Old oil fields show production can collapse. T. Boone Pickens (Texan oil billionaire) is now investing $10bn in wind to avoid the declining returns that are the nature of oil wells – i.e. production is highest right at the start and after that returns always diminish – just at different rates. North Sea Oil (last oil province ever discovered in 1980s) now collapsing at 8-9% /yr .
  3. Dearth of giants – global discovery is crashing. Just over 500 giant oil fields have been found (500 million barrels+), most before the peak of discovery (1950s-60s). Since England won the world cup, discovery has crashed. We’re using 85 million barrels per day. Average discovery size of oil fields is now only 20mb.
  4. Important to remember that lead time on frontier fields is 10 years and beyond to bring on stream. Average is six years but big ones are more than 10. Also, frontier fields present bigger challenges in exploitation – BP’s Thunderhorse field in Gulf of Mexico has been out of action for 3 years after being crippled in 2005 by Hurricane Dennis.
  5. The capacity pipeline drops fast from 2011.
  6. A third of global reserves may not even exist: phantom reserves because of founding of OPEC and introduction of quotas . Oil companies use OPEC data rather than their own, so the OPEC reserves could well be inflated, and thus ‘known’ oil reserves could be much smaller than reported by oil companies. He gave the example of Shell’s dishonesty about its proven reserves recently .
  7. The big hope of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) hasn’t helped the USA, the country where most of the techniques were developed and put into place first. At the start of oil drilling, only about 30% of a well could be exploited. Now, EOR techniques can raise that by 60-70%, but oil production is declining in the US , so although EOR may slow production decline, it won’t stop it.
  8. Melting tar sands . It’s too slow and too dirty to do. Oil companies have invested $25bn in rebranding as tar industries. Still, current capacity is only 1mbd. Oil industry estimate says that this will only rise to around 2.5mbd, not enough to counter the 4-5mbd decline in conventional supplies. It takes two tons of sand to produce just one barrel of oil.
  9. Coal-to-liquids will be too slow, too dirty. Canadian government has said that CTL will be illegal in Canada unless carbon sequestration is in place. So either the law will stick or the oil companies will bully their way through it. FTL / CTL very dirty and also too little too late. Chinese target is 20mbd by 2020.
  10. Gas will not be able to close the easy-oil gap because the decline will be too fast. 2011 now best bet for start of descent from plateau. Gas lasts longer, but cannot prop up overall production.
  11. The producer-economy risk to imports. E.g. Dubai, Saudi, Russia are all producing oil through the roof (even Iran has the highest domestic growth in the world in terms of oil: 8-10% growth per year). So at the current rate of domestic use, Iran won’t be exporting by 2015. Developers aren’t doing any planning for utilities in these fast-expanding regions so there is a great risk of energy insecurity.
  12. The infrastructure legacy problem is huge. E.g. BP’s leaky oil pipelines and exploding refinery in Houston. Most of the infrastructure was put in place in the late 70s/early 80s and not much has been built since. BP’s approach was to do a risk analysis on either updating infrastructure or paying out compensation. They put a price on workers’ lives of $20 million, and when 15 workers died in the refinery explosion , they just want to pay $500 million and move on.
  13. The industry faces a runaway skills shortage . Average age in oil industry is 49 (retire at 55).
  14. The industry isn’t investing enough. Goldman Sachs say $240bn investment per year is needed for the next 10 years. The IEA said that any investment increase is “illusory” – due to inflation. Exploration budgets were actually cut between 1998 and 2006 according to Baker Institute.
  15. CO2 will increasingly focus energy options. Best chance of hitting 2oC target is to emit no more than 340 billion tonnes of carbon, but according to industry estimates there are 10 times that much carbon in coal remaining, and 3 times that in oil. Even if those figures are massively inflated (see point 6 above)…
  16. There is enough coal to trigger climate ruin . The UK govt has recently given 6 licenses for open cast coal mining. We must rally against Kingsnorth Coal Power Plant. Biggest coal reserves are in the US, then Russia, China, India and Australia.
  17. Carbon capture won’t be ready in time to reduce emissions, UK is only scheduling trials now, when what we need is widespread implementation. Beware the promise of CCS-ready power stations!
  18. Nuclear would be too late and be a vampire. It will be 10 years minimum to build new plants, and even then it will only provide around 8% of UK electricity.
  19. Renewables have been held back too long. More than 10% of investment funding has gone into renewables now for the first time – good news but is it too little too late?
  20. We might face ‘no energy for energy’. The third global energy crisis is coming. The danger is that we might end up with no energy to fabricate technologies we know will work.
  21. Culture: quasi-institutionalised denial in around the carbon business. It’s like an act of treason to admit there may be problems if you work in oil!
  22. The ‘extremes and extremists’ problem. However bad this all is, we’re going to have more than just this to deal with. E.g. Citicorp (global investment bank) Chief Executive: “as long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance. We’re still dancing”. National Front loves peak oil because they think they can resurrect themselves during the economic dislocation.


And some good news:

  • The ‘seeing is believing’ effect. Importance of ‘tipping points’ in changing behaviours.
  • The Green New Deal / Transition – like the new deal for infrastructure projects after the great depression, the Green New Deal will involve the same widespread reskilling and redeployment of resources, but it is achievable.


Some recommended further reading:

  • “Collapse” by Jared Diamond – a scary book about how human civilizations can collapse.
  • “The Tipping Point” by Malcolm Gladwell – a positive book about the power we have to change.
  • “Transition towns” by Rob Hopkins – the founder of the transition towns movement, another positive book.
  • “The Carbon War” and “Half Gone” by Jeremy Leggett.


Questions

  • Q: What do you think about the idea of big solar power plants in the desert?
  • JL: you don’t need to be in the desert to use solar power. If all the roof space in the UK had solar panels installed, we would have more electricity than we need anyway! Obviously, this isn’t something I recommend, because we need a diverse energy mix to provide maximum efficiency and energy security. But, sunny countries are picking up on the idea of solar power plants. Look at the MASDAR project in Middle East.
  • Q: What about the intermittency of renewable energy sources, how can we service the electricity baseload?
  • JL: An experiment by the German Economics Ministry was run last year looking at powering Germany’s electricity grid, including baseload from renewable sources only. They found that they could do it all without nuclear or fossils, with renewables only.
  • Q: What about the embedded carbon in different renewable energy technologies? How much energy does it take to make a wind turbine or a solar panel, and how much energy do you get back during the lifecycle?
  • JL: That’s too complex a question to answer quickly, but “Energy Return on Investment” is a term that you should watch out for, it will become ever more important.


Posted by David Lockie on 30 Jun 2008

Biofuels 101 – the good, the bad & the ugly

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1341

15th April 2008 saw the launch of the UK Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RTFO), meaning that effective immediately, all fuel sold at UK pumps must contain 2.5% biofuel (either bioethanol in petrol or biodiesel in diesel).

Why? Because the world needs to wean itself off its addiction to high carbon fossil fuels

Sounds like a good idea, what’s the issue? Because if we use the wrong types of biofuels, rather than reducing our carbon emissions, we may in fact be increasing them and damaging the food chain in the process.

How could that happen? In essence - good intentions gone wrong, primarily caused by a lack of joined up thinking in government – incentivising the use of biofuels, without thinking through the implications... As an example, at the roots of the problem certain governments namely the US have championed the proliferation of corn-based bioethanol as a means of offsetting imported oil. On the surface a good idea, however when it comes to the detail, corn requires fossil-fuel derived fertilisers to produce, fossil fuels to transport, and perhaps the biggest problem of all – what was previously grown to feed humans and animals, is now grown to feed our vehicles (burning our food!). The obvious problem being that whilst we now have more fuel, we have substantially less food. As it is possible to make biofuel from a variety of cereal crops, this has had a direct effect on the price or rice for example which in Bangladesh has doubled in the last year – another clear sign that along with climate change, the poorest people are the ones who feel the effects most.

Another example of a lack of joined-up-thinking has resulted in vast rainforests (which actually store carbon), being destroyed to make room for Palm oil plantations. Palm oil is an edible vegetable oil, used in numerous products, and grown in a number of places in particular Malaysia and Indonesia. The increase in demand for biofuels (caused by mechanisms like the RTFO!) has resulted in a substantial increase in rainforest destruction, thereby increasing global carbon emissions!

So what is the solution? As we only have limited reserves of fossil fuels which are being rapidly depleted (and contribute to climate change in the process), doing nothing is not an option, so if we are to continue to use our existing vehicles designed to run on liquid fuels, we must use fuels which in their production and use have minimal impact on both the environment, and the food chain. Fortunately such options do exist. Currently the closest to-market most favourable option is to use the Jatropha plant, an inedible common weed, which grows in extremely harsh conditions where other plants can often not survive. Jatropha trees grow for 40 years and have seeds which when crushed release their oil.

So in summary: For as long as we have vehicles that run on liquid fuels we will need alternatives to high carbon fossil fuels. A viable alternative (but not the only solution!) is to use biofuels. However whilst some biofuels are very good, others are very bad, and it is vital that governments start to connect the dots, think through the options and possible outcomes, and ensure that mechanisms designed to increase the use of biofuels incentivise those which offer benefits, and prohibit those with potentially disastrous consequences.


Posted by David Lockie on 30 Jun 2008

Meet us at ecobuild

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1340

This week Todd and myself will be going to ecobuild at Earl's Court. We'll be there Tuesday, Wednesday and probably Thursday too.

We're hoping to learn more about building and converting buildings with reduced carbon footprints, keep abreast of the latest thinking and technology, and meet lots of like-minded organisations and people. Oh, and we'll probably try to spread the word about [http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/]www.LowCarbonEconomy.com[/url] whilst we're at it too!

If you're going to be at ecobuild and would like to meet us, we want to hear from you. Please email me on dl (at) LowCarbonEconomy.com, or go to the website and use the contact form.

See you there ecobuilders!


Posted by David Lockie on 30 Jun 2008

We're sponsoring London Aware '08...

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1339

...are you going?

LowCarbonEconomy.com is very proud to announce its sponsorship of London Aware '08 at the Barbican, London, May 10th and 11th.

Billed as "The most comprehensive green consumer event the UK has ever seen", the event features speakers from Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, Forum for the Future and many more.

We'll be exhibiting, so please put the date in your diary and come and participate in this exciting event - and pop by our stand to have a chat.

www.ukaware.com


Posted by David Lockie on 30 Jun 2008

Improved menu navigation, look and feel

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1337

After some unanimous initial feedback from our kind beta testers that the previous menu navigation was a huge headache and distracted from the rest of the site, we've come up with a far more manageable and user-friendly design. It'll be improved as we progress of course, but if you didn't like the menus before, check again now and let us know what you think.

Thanks!


Posted by David Lockie on 30 Jun 2008

Site Now Live as a Public Beta

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1336

We're very pleased to announce the first public version of www.lowcarboneconomy.com .

The site is still in a public beta mode: i.e. it's still in development, but we feel it's ready for user testing. We're going to be building up the site's content and adding functionality very quickly over the next month or so, but we'd really appreciate your comments on the site.

So, please visit the site and add some beta comments. Register, add some content, and get in touch if you want - we'll be pleased to hear from you!


Posted by David Lockie on 30 Jun 2008

Good News for UK Renewables

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1335

John Hutton's announcement over the weekend that the UK will invest massively in offshore wind power is great news for that industry, and for the UK renewables market in general.

http://environment.independent.co.uk/green_living/article3236132.ece

It was really the only option for hitting the UK's carbon targets for 2020 - nuclear would just take too long to come online.

It will be very interesting to watch the effect this major decision has on the rest of the UK energy market. Will investors now feel more confident backing renewable technologies?

Charles Anglin, Director of Communications for BWEA, said on Channel 4 news last night that the current national grid is not fit for such a large dependency on wind power (renewable electricity sources are not so predictable or controllable as conventional gas or nuclear power stations).

So, a large investment will be needed to enable the national grid connections and infrastructure. Will these improvements make the national grid more suitable for distributed generation from other renewables?

It will also be interesting to look at the supply/demand paradigm that this new infrastructure will support. When wind energy supply is high and demand is low will energy companies reduce the cost of electricity to help match supply and demand? In countries like Ireland which will be even more dependent on wind than the UK, there is talk of energy companies even paying users to use electricity when supply outstrips demand. What in turn will these users do with the surplus electricity?

I'd like to see it used to electrolyse hydrogen that can be used as fuel for transport and for fuelling stationary power generation when wind supply is low and demand is high.

Whatever the precise mechanics will be, I for one look forward to seeing how it develops.


Posted by David Lockie on 30 Jun 2008

Some Motivation

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1334

I've found two great pieces of motivation today to remind me why what we're doing is so important:

www.storyofstuff.com - a great video about consumption and the way that the developed world lives

and

poodwaddle.com/clocks3.htm - an earth clock that reminds us of the scale of the problem and its constancy

Enjoy!


Posted by David Lockie on 30 Jun 2008

First post!

Link to this post: http://www.lowcarboneconomy.com/_low_carbon_blog#blog1333

Welcome to our blog! The first post - how exciting!

The website for lowcarboneconomy.com is still in beta testing, but it's working really well and starting to look great too. In the meantime, if you add your email address on this page: www.lowcarboneconomy.com we'll keep you updated via our mailing list.

Whilst we get the website ready for general release, we've been busy creating some social sites to start helping to spread the word.

So far, we have:

Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lowcarboneconomy/
Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=7008982165
Facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=5768564643
Delicious: http://del.icio.us/lowcarboneconomy.com

And some public pages from our Google Reader:

Starred: http://www.google.com/reader/starred
All: http://www.google.com/reader/All

More: we have separated the feeds into categories like: Buildings, Climate Change, Companies, Environment, Ethical, Green and Eco, Low Carbon, Oil and fossil fuels, Renewables, Transport, Waste and Recycling, etc. If you would like me to post the public pages for these, just let me know and I'll put the URL's up.

A lot of these pages have RSS feeds too, so please add them to your RSS aggregator (like Google Reader etc) to keep track of what we see from day to day. Delicious is particularly useful as we post things we think are important and want to be able to find again later.

If you use del.icio.us (and you should - it's great), please add us to your network and post any links to us that you think we should look at: just add the 'for:lowcarboneconomy.com' tag.

OK - that's it for now, hopefully I'll be able to post again soon to say our site is available.



Related Marketplace Content

Domestic solar calculations for £150!
Want to know how much you will save?
We are independent consultants not sellers!
www.viridisec.co.uk
Send Business Card »    Discuss »
powerPerfector customers' case studies
Case studies and savings figures have in each case
been approved by the client
www.powerperfector.com/
39
Send Business Card »    Discuss »
Clean Technology Conference & Expo 2010
largest US Conference & Expo focused on technology
£1,800 grant from UK Trade & Investment
Cleantech Conference & Expo, USA
39
Send Business Card »    Discuss »
Eco Advantage Program - Channel Partners
Eco-responsibility is all about ecology and
economy blending together
www.sun.com/partners